Keep in mind that the "review" is completely subjective, and is the antithesis of "blind testing".

Likewise, we know almost nothing about the testing conditions which produced the alleged "objective science" part (the graph), making it of relatively limited use, except perhaps to justify the subjective part. Which came first - the listen or the measure? We just don't know, and it matters.

I think it is dangerous to discuss someone's perceived "tone".

Didn't the M60's get a "Approved and Recommended" out of this?

JBall, I simply don't understand your point. We have speakers to derive enjoyment. The measure of that enjoyment can only be your ears in your room. The graph doesn't come from either your room or a scientifically controlled environment, and your ears can't hear the graph. So, why does the graph matter so much to you?


bibere usque ad hilaritatem