|
Re: VP100 VS. M2I FOR CENTER CHANNEL
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2
newbie
|
newbie
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2 |
Are we talking about a single M2, or a pair of 'em? I would imagine horizontal dispersion would not be an isuue with a pair of M2's standing upright ... what do you think JohnK?
|
|
|
Re: VP100 VS. M2I FOR CENTER CHANNEL
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Id, we're talking about one M2. Horizontal dispersion isn't a problem with a single vertical speaker, such as the M2, which has broad dispersion in itself.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: VP100 VS. M2I FOR CENTER CHANNEL
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2
newbie
|
newbie
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2 |
Thanks for the clarification JK.
Does an M2 have the equivalent amount of shielding as the VP100/150 ?
|
|
|
Re: VP100 VS. M2I FOR CENTER CHANNEL
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 36
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 36 |
the center channels have better shielding. if i put my m2i right side up with the woofer on the bottom it distorts my tv picture. but with the speaker upside down it is fine. the tweeter magnet isnt as big i guess.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,476
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
1 members (Hambrabi),
1,022
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|