Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Re: 235:1 screen size input
#135928 04/25/06 02:16 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 16
M
connoisseur
OP Offline
connoisseur
M
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 16
What’s the ‘other’ method Randy? Doesn’t it use a different type of lens? Vertical compression? I can’t quite grasp that technique.

Re: 235:1 screen size input
#135929 04/25/06 02:33 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
If your referring to a vertical versus a horizontal type lens, they really do the same thing, but in a different manner. In both situations, you first have to scale the 2.35 image (vertically stretch) to reclaim the black bars.

The horizontal lens then takes that image, leaving the height alone, and horizontally stretches it back out to fill your 2.35 screen. In my opinion, these are best if your limited on depth of your room, and trying to achieve a big screen from a shorter throw distance.

The vertical design takes the same image and compresses(squeezes) it down from top/bottom until it fills your 2.35 screen. I think most people that use these types of lens, have a longer throw type projector, I don't think they would work that good from a short distance as your end result would be a smaller screen.

Hope this answers your question.


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: 235:1 screen size input
#135930 04/25/06 03:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 436
devotee
Offline
devotee
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 436
So if I understand correctly the horizontal lens is good for a constant height system while the vertical lens is good for a constant width system?

Re: 235:1 screen size input
#135931 04/25/06 04:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
I could be wrong on all of what I said above, just my understanding. I'm sure Panamorphs website would help to understand.

A Vertical squeeze design would seem to work better for constant width setups (where both 16:9 and 2.35:1 are the same width), where as horizontal stretch would seem to be ideal for constant height setups where you want the 2.35:1 image wider than 16:9.

To me an anamorphic lens is only worth it if you go constant height. The whole point of an anamorphic lens is to recreate the cinema feel by making 2.35 movies wider than the rest.

If your limited on the width of how big your screen can be, then a vertical design might be an option?


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: 235:1 screen size input
#135932 04/25/06 08:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 436
devotee
Offline
devotee
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 436
I would go with the same setup as yours, makes more sense.

Re: 235:1 screen size input
#135933 04/25/06 09:17 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 353
devotee
Offline
devotee
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 353
I agree. I think it is easier.

Randy, did you buy your lens direct from the manufacturer?

Re: 235:1 screen size input
#135934 04/25/06 10:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
Yes, there was a "Power Buy" on AVSforum 6-8 months ago from Prismasonic so I took advantage of the better pricing. I think Panamorph just recently came out with a horizontal design as well, not sure of the pricing. Ok I'll check......
.....
Looks to be $695 right now, not bad...you would have to read the specs to compare to the Prismasonic...
http://panamorph.com/UH50Program.html

It appears my model is currently selling for around $1100 USD, it will fluctuate depending on the Euro conversion each day.

http://prismasonic.com/english/prices_lens.asp
http://prismasonic.com/images/manual_front.png


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: 235:1 screen size input
#135935 04/26/06 02:41 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 353
devotee
Offline
devotee
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 353
In reply to:

Yes, there was a "Power Buy" on AVSforum 6-8 months ago from Prismasonic so I took advantage of the better pricing.




Ack! "Timing" and I don't seem to go very well together. Maybe they will have another one of these days. It will be awhile before I am able to get the lens anyway.

Re: 235:1 screen size input
#135936 04/26/06 02:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
I know recently Prismasonic was offering a DIY kit, where they send you all the stuff with instructions on how to put it all togethor. Not sure if that is still an option...


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: 235:1 screen size input
#135937 04/27/06 02:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4
newbie
Offline
newbie
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4
Here's a little something that's explains the aspect ratios.

http://www.electronichouse.com/columns/gear/8787.html

Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (BBIBH), 580 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4