 Re: My 2nd attempt at graphing my room response?
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
OP
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
Your correct about the 50hz dip, but if you look at graph 1, it does not appear to be as severe as 2,3 when looking at the other frequencies around it...
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: My 2nd attempt at graphing my room response?
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Well, Randy and John, the wavelength at 50Hz is about 23', so if the dip is a result of boundary interference effects this would call for a quarter-wavelength distance of about 6' to some surface to be causing a problem(yes, the distance is from the center of the subwoofer cone, not from any part of the enclosure).
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: My 2nd attempt at graphing my room response?
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7 |
Yeah, that's what is baffling us. We can't FIND that 6' distance, unless Randy is a big guy like me and was standing in front of the subwoofer holding a pool table while watching the meter 
Last edited by bridgman; 07/08/06 01:51 AM.
M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
1 members (rrlev),
354
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
