Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14978 07/15/03 10:11 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
BigWill Offline OP
connoisseur
OP Offline
connoisseur
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
Just did this once and now have to do it all over again because I forgot to put a title on it.

Short and sweet: I just heard Veritas 2.4s playing through Parasound equipment which included an $800 2 channel processor. The sound was awesome. My feeling is that the 2 channel processor was the primary reason this set up sounded so good.

My question is: How can I use my M60s to play as mains in my HT, but also play as L and R channels in a separate 2 channel set up without disconnecting and reconnecting the speakers every time I switch sources? Can it be done?

Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14979 07/15/03 11:37 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
What do you currently use as a processor?

I have my M60's hooked up to a Rotel RSP-1066 processor and a Rotel 1075 5 channel amp. It's as easy as selecting "2 Channel Stereo" on my 1066 processor if I want to hear 2 channel audio.

When I want to hear 5.1, I throw in a dvd, and the processor automatically switches to DTS, Dolby Digital, etc, and then puts out 5.1

fyi...those Veritas 2.4's will sound good regardless, because they're simply great speakers!


Last edited by spiffnme; 07/15/03 11:38 PM.
Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14980 07/16/03 12:31 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Yes Mark, as Craig mentioned you can simply select the stereo mode on your 2802 and the sound will go to your M60s alone(or sub too, if you want).


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14981 07/16/03 12:51 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
BigWill Offline OP
connoisseur
OP Offline
connoisseur
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
I think the original that I wrote and accidently deleted would have explained my question better. I currently have a Denon 2802 receiver which I really like. I usually listen to music in the "direct" mode rather than "stereo" because it sounds a little cleaner.

But how to switch my receiver from stereo to Dolby Digital, was not my question. I remember reading a post from a guy either here in the Axiom forum or on AVS forum, who complained that every 5.1 receiver he tried, HK and Denon included, didn't play simple 2 channel stereo well. I dismissed that, but after today I'm not so sure.

A few weeks ago I heard those Vienna Acoustics Beethovens ($4500 each) powered by a Denon receiver. What struck me was how similar that set up sounded to mine. What I heard today was much cleaner than either my system or the one with the Beethovens. I believe what I was hearing was very transparent speakers (like my Axioms, like the Beethovens) display the characteristic sound of their source. In the case of the Parasound separates, a very clean source.

If I hook my M60s up to a 2 channel processor like the one I heard today (with outboard amps) my M60s will no longer be hooked up to my Denon for HT. I lose my HT, and have to buy some M22s to replace the M60s. Or, and this was my question, is there some way to utilize the M60s in both setups without having to disconnect and reconnect the speakers everytime I want to switch sources? Like an A/B switch for speakers but used to switch sources instead.



Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14982 07/16/03 12:52 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
That Parasound separates setup should sound better than a Denon 2802. If you really want the best sound possible for both 5.1 and 2 (2.1) why not buy separates such as the Rotel gear I use. You'll get the 5.1 you want, but won't suffer any quality degradation when you listen to 2 (2.1)

Where do you live? You're more than welcome to come by my place and hear my M60's through my Rotel gear. If you want, you can even bring your Denon and we could listen to both.

Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14983 07/16/03 02:51 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9
regular
Offline
regular
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9
This was posted bt Curt Wishman of IRD on audiocircle.com in the IRD forum-

"Many people use their 2CH system and their HT receiver system together. The 2CH system becomes the front L&R channels in the HT. The HT receivers amplifiers provide the center and Rear L&R surround channels. This way you can get the best of both worlds.

The HT receivers front L&R preamp outputs are feed to the 2CH systems preamp and given a gain of x1 (OdB) either by using a HT pass-through input or standard input and setting the 2CH preamps gain to 0dB. Not the HT receiver controls the HT volume.

The HT receivers front L&R preamp outputs are feed to the 2CH systems preamp and given a gain of x1 (OdB) either by using a HT pass-through input or standard input and setting the 2CH preamps gain to 0dB. Not the HT receiver controls the HT volume." link

I believe the 2802 has preamp outputs so this should work for you.

Hope this helps. Dave





Last edited by DaveMoses; 07/16/03 02:55 AM.
Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14984 07/16/03 04:41 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
But wouldn't that still be "filtering" things through the HT system? I mean, the more layers in the mix, the more chance for loss, innit? I'd just go for high quality separates, if you're concerned about it. I'd say definitely try it out before going out and spending a fortune on them, though.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14985 07/16/03 04:02 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,490
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,490
Yeah, Wishman's suggestion sounds to me like passing the signal through a totally "unnecessary" layer of additional electronics.

In reply to:

Short and sweet: I just heard Veritas 2.4s playing through Parasound equipment which included an $800 2 channel processor. The sound was awesome. My feeling is that the 2 channel processor was the primary reason this set up sounded so good.



BigWill, so what exactly is that "2-channel processor" supposed to do? Anything unusual?


Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14986 07/16/03 04:21 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
BigWill Offline OP
connoisseur
OP Offline
connoisseur
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
I'm guessing here, as I'm not an electronics expert, that the surround circuitry in the HT receivers negatively impacts the recievers ability to play clean 2 channel stereo.After reading the link provided above, it appears others think the same thing.
I suppose it could also be that I just liked the sound of the Parasound processing equipment better than that of Denon. Maybe their 5.1 processors would do simple stereo just as well as their 2 channel processor does?

Re: 2 channel processors vs. HT receivers?
#14987 07/16/03 06:47 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
Your theory makes sense. Why else would many HT receiver makers offer the "Direct" option that bypasses all circuitry extraneous to a stereo signal?

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 667 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4