Get Free, Friendly, Expert Advice
Call 1-866-244-8796 or email

Designed and Manufactured in Canada Since 1980


AxiomAudio Blog

Blind Listening Tests

Sneak Peek into Axiom’s Current Research and Development

Axiom’s Newest Speaker: The In-Ceiling M3

Wall'O'Fame
Experimental Atmos
Greetings fellow Axiom owners...
Who's Online
2 registered (CV, Gary Vose Sr), 44 Guests and 6 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Financing
Forum Stats
13330 Members
11 Forums
22922 Topics
405243 Posts

Max Online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
Top Posters
Ken.C 17791
pmbuko 16289
SirQuack 13341
CV 11237
MarkSJohnson 10942
Meanwhile On Facebook

☺ Wow - our 13,000 likes! Awesome! #thankful

Did you get your "Golden Email"? The great gift certificate email giveaway star...

Here's a helpful article for everyone looking at putting a new stereo or home th...

Interesting article about who's getting the money from streaming radio services...

Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#153642 - 12/14/06 06:53 AM Amplifier Ratings
dmw Offline
hobbyist

Registered: 08/08/04
Posts: 21
Loc: Canton Michigan
I wonder what practical difference there is between a receiver like the HK 3480 which is rated at 120 per channel rms and 150 watts per channel at 4 ohms, verses a receiver like the NAD C720BEE, which is rated at 50 watts per channel at 8 ohms, but 120 watts (dynamic power) at 4 ohms, and 90 watts (short term power) at 4 ohms.

I notice the more expensive electronics like to underate their power output so that they seem so much more potent in terms of headroom and current capability. But couldnt we just call the Harmon Kardon a 50 watt receiver with a full 150 watt rms capability into 4 ohms?

I used to own a HK receiver years ago, and I can vouch for it's quality. NAD also has a good reputation, but I have never owned one.

I am interested in anyone's comments on these products, and particularly, is the NAD worth two or three times as much as the HK?

Thanks

dmw

Top
#153643 - 12/14/06 12:15 PM Re: Amplifier Ratings [Re: dmw]
alan Offline
connoisseur

Registered: 01/29/02
Posts: 3191
Loc: Toronto/New York/Dwight
Hi dmw,

Working in reverse order, the pricing of NAD simply reflects the policy of its Canadian owner/distributor, which also owns PSB speakers. They seem to never discount or if so, by very little.

The same used to be true of H/K gear in Canada, where the distributor seemed to price it much higher than the same components in the US, even taking into account the difference in the currency and generally higher pricing in Canada (population size one-tenth of the US, more expensive doing business, costly shipping, etc. etc.)

A couple of things on the NAD power ratings. First, ignore "dynamic power", which isn't a standard at all and is basically a bogus rating, a way to inflate power output ratings with no regard to distortion or the duration of the "dynamic power." On the other hand, "dynamic headroom", rated in dB, is a real standard. NAD amplifiers often have about 3 dB of dynamic headroom, which means they'll produce twice their rated output for a long enough period to handle brief musical peaks on recordings of wide dynamic range.

The NAD amps typically have a couple of sets of voltage rails; one set is for higher power output on a momentary, short-term basis, a matter of milliseconds (NAD may specify this somewhere). And that's fine for brief musical peaks. So your NAD realistically likely has a bit less than 3 dB of dynamic headroom if its "short-term" power output is specified at 90 watts.

The H/K, if it's rated at 150 watts continuous output into 4 ohms, both channels driven, from 20 Hz to 20 kHz, with less than blah, blah THD, then it should be considered the more powerful amplifier. It might even have a smidgen of dynamic headroom, but many manufacturers don't rate or measure this aspect of performance, preferring the bogus "dynamic power output" spec instead.

Overall, I'd say No, the NAD is not worth the premium over the H/K, and I'd wager that if you put a spectrum analyzer on the output of the NAD during its peak dynamic headroom swings and on the H/K at the same output levels, the distortion of the H/K would measure lower than the NAD's. As to whether that would translate into cleaner sound, I doubt it, but I'd still go for the more powerful amplifier at the lower price--if it's measured as I outlined. Even at 8 ohms, the H/K is more powerful than the NAD.

Regards,
_________________________
Alan Lofft,
Axiom Resident Expert

Top
#153644 - 12/15/06 09:00 PM Re: Amplifier Ratings [Re: alan]
jakewash Offline
shareholder in the making

Registered: 12/26/03
Posts: 10399
Loc: Calgary, Alberta
Very nicely put, makes me wish I bought an H/K instead of Denon.
_________________________
Jason
-----------------
TTTHHHPPPPPTTTT!

My HT

Top



Moderator:  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Home  |  Corporate Info  |  Products  |  Message Board  |  FAQs  |  Warranty  |  Site Map  |  Privacy Statement   |  Contact Us

©2014 Colquhoun Audio Laboratories Limited
All Rights Reserved.