Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Q8's for music?
#164656 04/11/07 02:11 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 49
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 49
My question is if you are building a surround system primarily for music would q8's still be ideal or would it be more practical to spring for something with more omph? Also, are rear signals without bass typical, or do they have the ability to move some air? All the surround systems I've seen at friends and families houses have practically nothing coming out of the rear speakers except atmospheric treble. Do they just have the wrong settings or is that normal?


Me playing Hendrix with my teeth: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYaBBemvA7U
Re: Q8's for music?
Scuffernoose #164657 04/11/07 02:21 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102
Unfortunatly, that is how most "home theatre in a box" systems sound combined with improper calibration.

All the speakers should be crossed over at an average of 80hz to the sub woofer to handle the low end. LFE is non-directional, so you shouldn't be able to tell where it is coming from.

Concerening mutlichannel music, many like the QS8s, but direct radiating speakers are suggested. Such as the M2 or M3.

The M3 has a little more umph than the M2 does.

I do not currently do any multichannel listening, perhaps others will chime in.

-Hutz


Producer | Composer
www.robbhutzal.com
Re: Q8's for music?
Scuffernoose #164658 04/11/07 03:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
In my opinion even though the Q's are the best surround out there, they also to a fabulous job for music, in my opinion.

They have plenty of ummmmf, I had my Emotive mps-1 turned up to 110+dB and they didn't sweat.


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: Q8's for music?
Scuffernoose #164659 04/11/07 03:35 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
Quote:

My question is if you are building a surround system primarily for music would q8's still be ideal or would it be more practical to spring for something with more omph?


I guess that would depend on budget and WAF, for true multichannel listening all speakers the same is the ideal but the QS8's do a great job for their size if the ideal is not achieveable.

As Hutzal said most HT systems are generally not setup right and the samller HT in a box systems are not known for great sound.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: Q8's for music?
jakewash #164660 04/11/07 07:00 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
I can only relay my specific experience. I didn't buy the QS8s right away and was going to use my old trusty HK bookshelves for surrounds.

I adjusted and readjusted their angles but they were just to directional or something as they just seemed lacking despite their great performance as fronts in my old much smaller house.

I saved up for QS8s and was blown away by the difference in surround effects and I preferred them for music as well. To phrase it in less than professional terms, the room just semed more filled up with music. Admittedly, I didn't swap them in and out to compare.


With great power comes Awesome irresponsibility.
Re: Q8's for music?
SirQuack #164661 04/11/07 08:27 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
Quote:

I had my Emotive mps-1 turned up to 110+dB and they didn't sweat.



That's because the treadmill died.

Re: Q8's for music?
pmbuko #164662 04/11/07 08:49 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102
Quote:

Quote:

I had my Emotive mps-1 turned up to 110+dB and they didn't sweat.



That's because the treadmill died.




You are so naughty!


Producer | Composer
www.robbhutzal.com
Re: Q8's for music?
pmbuko #164663 04/12/07 12:42 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
Actualy, the treadmill is the generator for my AV equipment, so I was running really fast.


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: Q8's for music?
Murph #164664 04/12/07 03:34 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 49
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 49
Quote:

To phrase it in less than professional terms, the room just semed more filled up with music.



Excellent, thats what I was wondering.


Me playing Hendrix with my teeth: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYaBBemvA7U

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 845 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4