Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
M60 and Bi-wire
#1703 02/19/02 03:13 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I recently bought M60s and I am running them with an ONKYO recvr.

I am using the Monster Bi-wired cable. This is how my connection looks:

I am B-wiring it on the speakers side.
The first cable will run from recvr Speaker(A) Left to the Left Speaker (which will be B-wired)

The second cable will run from recvr Speaker(B) Right to the Right Speaker (which will be B-wired).

A-Left-Recvr ----< Left Speaker
B-Right-Recvr ----< Right Speaker

And I have removed the jumpers. I have noticed that if I bi-wire the speakers my sorround sound is getting really messed up.

My questions is can I biwire M60's?? Why do I have to sets of binding post if I cannot bi-wire them? Is it only bi-ampable but not bi-wirable????

Advice please.....





Re: M60 and Bi-wire
#1704 02/19/02 03:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
To bi-wire the M60s, you should connect the two sets of cables to the left and right speaker outputs for Speaker A.

Don't use the outputs from Speaker B to run the right-channel speakers. I believe you may have introduced an out-of-phase condition, which would mess up your surround sound in a major way (no permanent damage, by the way.)

That said, there is no acoustical benefit to bi-wiring. It just lowers the resistance between the amp and the speakers (it can't hurt), but so long as you are using quality cables of sufficient gauge, there is no sonic benefit to bi-wiring. It just creates wiring problems like yours with consumers and lets cable companies sell more cable. So put back the jumpers on the M60's and connect them normally with one set of cables to each speaker. Your surround sound will be fine, and there will be NO difference in sound quality. Trust me on this one. No carefully controlled listening tests on bi-wiring have ever demonstrated that there is any sonic benefit to be realized.

I'll deal with bi-amping another day. . .

Regards,

Alan Lofft
Axiom Resident Expert


Alan Lofft,
Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
Re: M60 and Bi-wire
#1705 02/19/02 05:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 6
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 6
No, if the facility to biamp or biwire is available, you should be able to connect them properly. I agree with Alan on the point that it confuses most people, and causes dissatisfaction when it is not connected properly. As he mentioned, you most likely have done no damage, but have created a phase problem.

Your best bet is to simply connect them without biwire connections, and make sure everything works. Biwiring may work, but lets make sure it sounds proper in regular wired mode.

The concept of biwiring and biamping has a basis in the designer "splitting" the crossover into 2 independent modules, and providing separate external connections. They are connected normally, and a provision to break the crossover into 2 modules by removing a connector is included. For biamping, this can mean you are able to drive the 2 modules and respective drivers with separate amps, or biwire - connect separate cables at each connector that are joined to the same amp channel. The main premise is to isolate the crossover sections and eliminate distortion. Remember, crossover networks are electronic components, and are subject to all the properties of such devices. They are made up of, but not limited to resistors, capacitors and inductors. Biwiring also changes the "network load" on an amp, as a cable is also a complex load of the above values similar to a speaker and crossover network.

As Alan states, the benefits are an area of much discussion. It very powerful, specially designed systems, the effects are noticeable. For most of us humans, the debate rages on. Biamping is another matter.

I got your private message, and will respond to it as well.

Regards,

BBIBH

Re: M60 and Bi-wire
#1706 02/19/02 07:51 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
If bi-wiring causes so many problems and gives no acoustical benefits, why do you put it in M60i-es?



Re: M60 and Bi-wire
#1707 02/19/02 07:55 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
A good point!

Sounds like BBIBH wants to disagree with Alan on the biwire feature, but is maybe too polite to get down and dirty!

BBIBH, is there a difference? I can't believe that Ian would include a feature with extra cost that does nothing?

Rick



Re: M60 and Bi-wire
#1708 02/20/02 04:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 6
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 6
The original poster and I have taken this off line, as he has some difficult and possibly serious problems.

As for my thoughts on biwiring, I am in the middle. Yes it does make a difference in some circumstances, and not in others. I do not believe everything that the testing at NRC has revealed. This is because statistics can be used to prove anything the original testing panel set out to prove. The testing results and literature I have read from tests (admittedly sometime ago) does not establish proper scientific methods.

That having been said, they have enabled companies to produce quality products - such as Axiom loudspeakers. It gets back to what I have said many times, I am not interested in what people think or hear, I am interested in what I hear. Again, wholey subjective, but based on my tastes.

My thoughts on magazines and reviewers is another matter. Some magazines and reviewers I will read, and some I will/ do not. Personal tastes, and again, subjective.

Regards,

BBIBH

Re: M60 and Bi-wire
#1709 02/21/02 08:48 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 8
Ian Offline
President
connoisseur
Offline
President
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 8
I think you must be missing some information if you are questioning the scientific methods used at NRC; they are proper. These scientific tests at the NRC did however disprove some myths that can be hard to let go of. I know; I went through it.

Ian Colquhoun
President & Chief Engineer


Ian Colquhoun
President & Chief Engineer
Re: M60 and Bi-wire
#1710 02/21/02 09:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 6
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 6
No, I do not believe I am missing anything, and I have rethought positions on many items.
Techniques and theories that are properly aligned are wonderful tools. Many times the theoretical end points justify the procedures, sometimes they do not.

I can understand your defending them, since many quality observations have emerged from NRC. I hold many things I have experienced resulting from research performed there in high regard. While others are simply pandering to the masses. In terms of audio, I refuse to believe that If I can honestly say there is a difference in something, and NRC has declared it is not so in whatever type of listening test, that I am imagining things. Many magazines make the same mistake, or go the complete opposite. Some of them use antiquated testing methods, or the testing labs have ties to the magazines. Hardly objective. But in this case I would agree that it is difficult to argue the validity of all testing. I researched an issue while in college, and I tested using similar methods, and newer proven techniques and found a differing result. Perhaps I will look at recent research.

As you mentioned, it is difficult to let go or change mindsets. I have several changes I am fighting with currently. Anytime an imperfect human (virtually every human) is involved, everything becomes subjective. This is an across the board statement, not singling anyone or issue out

Critical thinking and objectivity are learned traits. Proper scientific methods creates theories and works to prove or disprove them. The desired output is what is determined, not the other way around.

Regards,

BBIBH

Re: M60 and Bi-wire
#1711 02/21/02 09:53 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Uhmm.. back to bi-wiring question,
does it have any sense or not, and if not, why to put the capability in?



Re: M60 and Bi-wire
#1712 02/21/02 11:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 6
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 6
Yes, I guess we did get carried away.....

Ian , I remember hearing about NRC and Project Athena. Has anything come from this? That was sometime ago, and I would be interested in reading anything published.

The original poster and I have been working offline to determine the problems he has. We have seemingly made progress, and continue to exchange thoughts and testing results.

I would venture that Ian includes the ability to BIAMP the speakers. That is the nature of the technical connections included in the speakers. This feature can be used to BIWIRE as well. I am somewhat convinced that his design was aimed at biamping, and the same connections conveniently can be used for biwiring.

As for if it makes a difference, well, you have read the previous posts. Your mileage may vary.

Regards,

BBIBH

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,939
Posts442,452
Members15,615
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 221 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4