Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Recommended crossover for VP100?
#177757 10/03/07 05:59 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8
W
regular
OP Offline
regular
W
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8
I was just wondering what crossover people recommended for the VP100. I currently have it set to 100HZ only because that is above the -3db 95HZ limit.

I read somewhere that the crossover point for a speaker should be 2 times the -10db output. For the VP100 that would be about 120HZ, which, as happens, is exactly the value that my Yamaha YAPO (auto optimization) suggested.

What do most of you use?

Thanks,
Jim

Re: Recommended crossover for VP100?
wesley63 #177758 10/03/07 06:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
I don't know about the 100 but my 150 starts to drop off at 75Hz in my room. I have a global cross-over and I set it to 80Hz for movies and 60Hz for music.

Re: Recommended crossover for VP100?
Mojo #177759 10/03/07 06:26 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8
W
regular
OP Offline
regular
W
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8
Thanks for the response Mojo.

You hit upon my exact question. With the 60HZ setting for the VP100 or VP 150, I think that there is a dip introduced in the mid-bass region (60 to 85 or 95HZ). Of course how noticeable this is in just the center channel is arguable. All of my other speakers go down to at least 60HZ and will fill in with a 60HZ or 80HZ crossover point.

And it may not be noticeable at all because I bet that these crossovers are not etched into stone. An 80HZ crossover does not mean whap! the sub-woofer stops at 81HZ and the mains work for anything above 79HZ. There is probably a band of overlap.

Thanks,
Jim

Re: Recommended crossover for VP100?
wesley63 #177760 10/03/07 07:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
I think the dip you mention is very much room-dependent. I don't encounter a significant dip in my room until 110Hz. This is a result of comb filtering due to the distance to my rear wall.

The cross-over filter slopes are usually not specified but I believe that most are either 12dB or 24dB per octave. I've been told that they are 24dB/octave on the Denons. So if I set the cross-over to 80 on my Denon, by 160Hz the response is down by 24dB. Therefore by 90Hz, the response is already down by 3dB or half-power.

Re: Recommended crossover for VP100?
Mojo #177761 10/04/07 02:20 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
The standard crossover slopes, as recommended by THX, are a 24dB/octave low pass with a 12dB/octave high pass. Most receivers, as shown for example in the Sound&Vision lab tests, follow this.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: Recommended crossover for VP100?
wesley63 #177762 10/04/07 03:03 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745
Likes: 17
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745
Likes: 17
Quote:

With the 60HZ setting for the VP100 or VP 150, I think that there is a dip introduced in the mid-bass region (60 to 85 or 95HZ). Of course how noticeable this is in just the center channel is arguable



Another related thought, how much bass material below 80Hz would be mixed for a centre channel knowing that most centre units do not handle sound in that low a range?
I think ppl worry too much about setting the surround and centre crossovers at points marginally lower than the rated frequency response cutoffs.


"Those who preach the myths of audio are ignorant of truth."
Re: Recommended crossover for VP100?
chesseroo #177763 10/04/07 12:28 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8
W
regular
OP Offline
regular
W
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8
Good point, chesseroo. For movies, where the sound engineer is creating a sound-scape from scratch, this is probably true. They would try to cater to the THX standards. For multi-channel music, I would think that the engineers would just try to pick up every sound that they can at each microphone. I don't know how much diverting of frequencies from one channel to another would take place in post production. I may be completely wrong about this, I have never engineered a multi-channel music recording before (or any commercial recording for that matter. )

Jim


Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 357 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4