Get Free, Friendly, Expert Advice
Call 1-866-244-8796 or email

Designed and Manufactured in Canada Since 1980


AxiomAudio Blog

Blind Listening Tests

Sneak Peek into Axiom’s Current Research and Development

Axiom’s Newest Speaker: The In-Ceiling M3

Wall'O'Fame
Greg's pseudo-HT room
EP175v4 with M3v4
Who's Online
3 registered (BBIBH, J. B., Boltron), 42 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Financing
Forum Stats
13336 Members
11 Forums
22946 Topics
405851 Posts

Max Online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
Top Posters
Ken.C 17809
pmbuko 16298
SirQuack 13344
CV 11273
MarkSJohnson 10967
Meanwhile On Facebook

Shopping made easy! Need it by the 24th? Upgrade to air shipping for just $20!...

Just two more days! Better tell your gift-givers! http://axiomaudio.com/holida...

So many people took advantage of the weekend sales! Lots of auditioning about t...

Only a few hours left to get a gift card worth up to 25% of your purchase! http:...

Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#2126 - 03/20/02 01:18 PM osund of cone vs dome in mids
Anonymous
Unregistered


I understand Axioms (M22's, M3's) crossover around 3.7khz while many competitors crossover at a much lower, (ie Paradigm xover at 1500hz).

My question is, characteristics would I typically 'hear' when that 1500-3700hz range is produced with a cone midbass driver (ala Axiom) vs a dome tweeter (ala Para)? I'd be interested in any and all comments
Thanks,
Peter C

Top
#2127 - 03/30/02 07:40 AM Re: osund of cone vs dome in mids
Ian Offline
President
aficionado

Registered: 03/13/01
Posts: 811
The actual sound produced at each frequency from a cone or a dome is the same. The reason for trying to get the tweeter crossover frequency down low is because smaller diaphragms tend to have better off axis performance. This only holds true to a point mind you where the wavelengths of the frequencies start to get long enough that the larger diaphragms will also give you perfect off axis dispersion. The above being said, it would seem on the surface that lower tweeter crossover points are desirable but there are actually some serious drawbacks to doing this. The smaller cone will start to have a very difficult time reproducing the lower frequencies you are asking of it without distortion as you increase the output. This will make the speaker very irritating at higher volume. We always try to get the best possible off axis response from the mid bass drivers as opposed to lowering the crossover frequency to the tweeter to achieve the desired off axis performance.
_________________________
Ian Colquhoun
President & Chief Engineer

Top
#2128 - 03/31/02 02:52 PM Re: osund of cone vs dome in mids
BBIBH Online   content
connoisseur

Registered: 01/10/02
Posts: 1054
Loc: Canada
I remember reading about the Human hearing range in a medical journal. The crux of the discussion centered around the frquency range of a typical human. The test data indicated that the range can be as wide as 20hz to 20khz, with wide variances downwards. But that human hearing is most sensitive in the 200hz to 2khz range.

If this is in fact true, then it would make absolute sense to keep a crossover point out of this range. While there are several well employed crossover designs, all add problems into the equation.
_________________________
Regards,

Mike

Top



Moderator:  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Home  |  Corporate Info  |  Products  |  Message Board  |  FAQs  |  Warranty  |  Site Map  |  Privacy Statement   |  Contact Us

©2014 Colquhoun Audio Laboratories Limited
All Rights Reserved.