Axiom Home Page Forums General Discussion Stereo A musical revelation

Actually, I've got a Radeon 9500 (should be pretty fast...) and an Athlon 1400 (yes, one of the burning hot ones) and Planetside is majorly chunky unless I turn a lot of stuff down. I know the video card can handle it, and I've got plenty of RAM (896 MB). Therefore, processor still matters.

Actually that would probably depend if it's a pro or a non pro 9500. The 9500 pro is pretty nice, whereas the 9500 non-pro at defaults isn't that great, but I'd chose the 9500np. The reason being is that about 85-90% of 9500 np's can be 'softmodded' to a 9700 pro by drivers which enable the other 4 pipelines and the 256 bit memory architecture (only if the memory is in an L shape ).

In reply to:

---

Yes I was kinda interchanging RISC based AIX systems which runs PowerPC chip to Mac G5 PowerPC chips.

---

Which you shouldn't do.

In reply to:

---

That was my intention because both does run unix to a certain degree.

---

I'm talking about the processors. The Power4 and the PPC 970 aren't the same chip. You're drawing a connection between them that others who aren't familiar with these processors may perceive as greater than it should be.

In reply to:

---

But what I was refering to as a 64bit Power4 or Power4+ are these.
http://www-132.ibm.com/content/home/store_IBMPublicUSA/en_US/eServer/pSeries/mid_range/pSeries_midrange.html

---

I'm aware. Notice those prices? A large part of that cost is the Power4 which costs upwards of $4000 per processor. The 970 is a consumer grade processor and the Power4 is distinctly not.

In reply to:

---

And yes the PowerPC970 is 64bit but that is not what I am talking about.

---

I never brought up anything about that.

In reply to:

---

Both the IBM Pseries 6xx server and the G4 or G5 do run Unix ..yes of different flavors one AIX..the other I think BSD.

---

OSX isn't BSD, but it borrows VERY heavily from it. It borrows from quite a few different open source OS's. The correct name for the unix variant Apple has pulled together is Darwin.

In reply to:

---

http://www.apple.com/g5processor/
Scroll down to the area that talks about the the G5 and IBM 64bit Power4 processor. Apple worked with IBM to leverage the Power4 technlogy to create the G5.

---

I'm intimitely aware. IBM's RISC server group is one of my biggest customers.

In reply to:

---

I was comparing this...

In reply to:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The PowerPC G5 can pump through more than 200 in-flight instructions at a time, a whopping 71% more than the 32-bit Pentium 4



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


... I was comparing G5 to P4

---

But in the sentance prior, you mention the Power4 which isn't the G5 and then transition to a statement about the G5. Someone unfamiliar with the relationship between the two would likely be confused. That's what I was commenting on.

In reply to:

---

Wheres proof? How many instructions per cycle can the P4 do? How fast is a P4 cycle in comparison to the G5.

---

As in all things computer related, the details are in the applications. There are countless benchmarks out at this point. In some things, the G5 is exceptional. In others, the Opteron is king. In yet more the Pentium is the best choice. It's all about what you want to do with it.

In reply to:

---

I have gotten information from a Mac user from my company that he has rendered a 300meg+ 3D object in realtime on Photoshop with a G5 vs and a fast CPU P4 with somewhat the same GPU and found that the MAC did create it much faster almost realtime.

---

I have no doubt.

In reply to:

---

But there are a lot of Unix gurus out there creating stuff for the G5 because the OS is opensource.

---

Darwin, the Unix core, is open source. This is not the same thing as OSX itself being open source. The majority of that OS is indeed closed.

In reply to:

---

They are trying out their scripts and thinking this can be used for fileservers which may cost under $15,000 in comparison to some of the $50,000+ IBM Pseries servers. It may not do all the functions they need but for something 1/3 the price its one hell of a machine.

---

They'd probably be better off running Linux or some other BSD on a 970 based computer not sold at the margins Apple enjoys. Remember, this chip isn't sold just to Apple and IBM has intentions of taking it a lot further into exactly that space.

Regards,
Semi

Reading for those interested in this stuff:
http://arstechnica.com/cpu/03q1/x86-64/x86-64-1.html
http://arstechnica.com/archive/news/1062961031.html
http://arstechnica.com/cpu/02q2/ppc970/ppc970-1.html
http://arstechnica.com/cpu/03q1/ppc970/ppc970-0.html
http://www.arstechnica.com/cpu/03q2/ppc970-interview/ppc970-interview-1.html

Thanks for the links.

Yeah, I've got the Pro. I thought that could be upclocked to 9700 Pro, not the 9500 regular. Whatever; I'm not likely to do it. It's the ATi boxed card, not another brand.

Those latest IBM, Intel, HP and AMD CPUs are all nice powerful chips. But when it comes to the CAPABILITY computing (as opposed to capacity computing), we the Americans have gotten a little too proud of our off-the-shelf, general-purpose CPU chips -- falsely believing for too long that massively paralleling them would result in the world's most powerful supercomputers. That was a big mistake...

According to the prestigeous TOP500 listings, the 40-TFLOPS Earth Simulator, based on the vector-processor chips custom-made by NEC (sort of like the Cray chips), will remain unchallenged for the next 2 years or so. Moreover, the real surprise is that this machine can actually maintain ~70% of its peak FLOPS when running the real-world weather simulation applications -- a far cry from 10-20% figures often seen in American massively parallel systems based on the off-the-shelf CPU chips.

In case you are wondering, the NEC chips run at a whopping 500MHz clock. As for the operating system, the Earth Simulator runs a version of NEC's Unix, with some custom extensions.

So, back to the tritare, what makes those haunted, spacey sound? I suppose that it is an unusual series of harmonic (perhaps non-harmonic) frequencies. But where can I find the technical principles behind the instrument?