Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 6 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Re: M22 Ninja Master Crossover review.
EFalardeau #229632 11/13/08 06:39 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
OP Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
Rite on!!!


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: M22 Ninja Master Crossover review.
jakewash #229649 11/13/08 04:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471
Rite Aid!


Bears, beets, Battlestar Galactica.
Re: M22 Ninja Master Crossover review.
medic8r #229651 11/13/08 04:25 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
<scooby>Rite row rye rink rime raking ris roo rar.

Re: M22 Ninja Master Crossover review.
pmbuko #229663 11/13/08 05:26 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471
hee HEE hee hee hee he.


Bears, beets, Battlestar Galactica.
Re: M22 Ninja Master Crossover review.
medic8r #229664 11/13/08 05:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
The question I have is it worth the cost of the upgrade?


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: M22 Ninja Master Crossover review.
SirQuack #229669 11/13/08 05:48 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116
Framer2180 mentioned in his posts I (again personal opinion) would likely not spend the extra dollars for the change. As we all know, sound is subjective, some would undoubtably find the modified M22's "better" and would have to decide for themselves the cost/benefit of the upgrade.

Personally I am not a tweaker so I do not see much "value" in these sorts of things. These type of products I would imagine would be appealing to the esoteric and "high end" crowd/industry who spend money regardless of the cost/benefit the product offers.

Last edited by Dr.House; 11/13/08 05:51 PM.

I’m armed and I’m drinking. You don’t want to listen to advice from me, amigo.

-Max Payne
Re: M22 Ninja Master Crossover review.
BlueJays1 #229680 11/13/08 07:49 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
OP Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
I was thinking that the Ninja XO's would be good for someone wanting a different sound and are presently looking at other speakers, but already own M22's, then the $200-300 doesn't look too costly.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: M22 Ninja Master Crossover review.
jakewash #229697 11/13/08 09:38 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
I should start a web company that sells an infrared-activated crossover switcher (remote included) that can switch M22s between the stock and Ninja crossovers. \:\)

Re: M22 Ninja Master Crossover review.
pmbuko #229699 11/13/08 09:43 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
RF would be preferable. No bluetooth.


See Mojo's signature
Re: M22 Ninja Master Crossover review.
EFalardeau #229701 11/13/08 09:45 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
Nah, you'd probably get interference with RF.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Page 6 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,940
Posts442,457
Members15,616
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 386 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4