Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: a quick blurb on the S/N 972
SirQuack #224668 10/09/08 10:46 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
Yeah, I thought the wpc was a little low.


-David
Re: a quick blurb on the S/N 972
terzaghi #224709 10/10/08 03:31 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
Now if it'll just become available for sale!

Re: a quick blurb on the S/N 972
spiffnme #224713 10/10/08 03:53 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 105
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 105
Nice looking unit though, clean and symetrical - I don't think 100wpc should be an issue for most HTs unless you are getting in to a larger 2500 - 3000 + area and if so, then you would most likely have an amp to compensate.

Re: a quick blurb on the S/N 972
lucv13 #224716 10/10/08 04:05 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
OP Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
I thought S/N was/is known for under rating their amps? It could very well be 120-140wpc.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: a quick blurb on the S/N 972
jakewash #224717 10/10/08 04:11 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 105
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 105
All I know is my little 80wpc Marantz has plenty of power in my 25 x 16 living room - I am rethinking my plans of purchasing an extra amp next spring - The S/N should have plenty of power

Last edited by lucv13; 10/10/08 04:12 AM.
Re: a quick blurb on the S/N 972
lucv13 #224768 10/10/08 04:24 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
yeah, but the denon 3808 is claimed at 130wpc and I am pretty sure that is an under-rated conservative number too. (at least I read something at audioholics about one of the lower end denons being way udner-rated so I assume that the higher end ones are too)

But yeah, I don't think it would be a problem... just sounds a little low.


-David
Re: a quick blurb on the S/N 972
terzaghi #224772 10/10/08 04:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
I know HK has always been a conservative rating, nice to know SN follows the same practice, unlike Sony. \:\)


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: a quick blurb on the S/N 972
terzaghi #224775 10/10/08 05:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
OP Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
 Originally Posted By: terzaghi
yeah, but the denon 3808 is claimed at 130wpc and I am pretty sure that is an under-rated conservative number too. (at least I read something at audioholics about one of the lower end denons being way udner-rated so I assume that the higher end ones are too)
These lab tests showed the 3808 meets the all channels driven spec at it's rated 130W/ch.@1% distortion and it does go up for 5 channels driven to 137w and 187w for 2 channels, so it is not an overachiever with respect to all channels driven.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: a quick blurb on the S/N 972
jakewash #224843 10/11/08 01:14 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
thanks jakewash. I forget which denon I reaed about at audioholics ...


-David
Re: a quick blurb on the S/N 972
jakewash #224858 10/11/08 02:46 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Just to emphasize that the Denon, along with most other receivers, doesn't rate power under an all-channels driven spec. The basic two-channels driven test number acceptable under the FTC regs(full rated power for at least five minutes continuously) is used and is met with some room to spare, as is typical of the other makes of receivers as well. This of course contradicts frequent complaints by some audiophiles that published power ratings are "exaggerated", or even "lies". It's rather ironic that some of the folks who say these things are willing to believe that totally unproven sonic characteristics of players, amplifiers and even pieces of wire exist, while they're suspicious about the only aspect of audio performance that's actually subject to specific regulations.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,477
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 946 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4