Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
For SACD collection owners...
#268876 08/11/09 03:04 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 93
B
bluray Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
B
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 93
What's your view on the significance of DSD to analog conversion at the processing/receiving point (vs. player conversion to PCM before passing signal)?

Re: For SACD collection owners...
bluray #268877 08/11/09 03:17 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
If you rely upon any sort of bass crossover, time alignment, equalization, or room correction for optimal playback, you're going to have to convert to PCM to do any of that processing (well, some players/receivers can do the crossover without the conversion).

If the receiver can perform any of those tasks on a DSD feed, it's turning it to PCM first. If those features are not available when feeding DSD, and you'd like to be able to use them, it's beneficial to have a player which can do the conversion.

Personally, I don't like the technology behind DSD, I don't see how it can be a benefit. It has a slewrate (PCM can go from 0 to max in one sample), and it can't store a DC signal (the closest it can approximate is a 1-bit triangle wave at 1.4 MHz). Sure, it is a closer approximation of an analog source, but when working digitally I don't see why that is a good thing.

DSD converted to 172.4 KHz (even 88.2) 24-bit PCM should be virtually indistinguishable.


Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011
Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8
Sony PS4, surround backs
-Chris

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,944
Posts442,472
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (tiwee), 369 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4