Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: Room acoustic question
ClubNeon #317032 07/29/10 04:23 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 769
bdpf Offline OP
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 769
Originally Posted By: ClubNeon
You can get panel treatments (which tame treble, not so much bass), with photos printed on them. Designed specifically for the WAF.

Good idea, I'll have to google that! I bet this was designed by men laugh


Bruno
M80s/VP180/QS8s/EP600/AVR-890
------------------------------------
"The problem is choice..."
Re: Room acoustic question
Lampshade #317033 07/29/10 04:24 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 769
bdpf Offline OP
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 769
Originally Posted By: Lampshade
I once dragged my queen size mattress into my living room. It worked wonders. Do you think your wife will let you do that?

LOL! I'm sure she'll love it!


Bruno
M80s/VP180/QS8s/EP600/AVR-890
------------------------------------
"The problem is choice..."
Re: Room acoustic question
bdpf #317034 07/29/10 04:39 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
Here's a couple I had bookmarked (not that I was interested in these, being a single male, but other products from the same makers).

http://www.asc-home-theater.com/picture-panel.htm
http://www.auralex.com/sonicprint/
http://www.gikacoustics.com/gik_artpanel.html


Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011
Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8
Sony PS4, surround backs
-Chris
Re: Room acoustic question
Lampshade #317036 07/29/10 07:04 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
Originally Posted By: Lampshade
I once dragged my queen size mattress into my living room. It worked wonders. Do you think your wife will let you do that?


When I asked a friend who’s an audio engineer I might benefit from room treatments on my back wall. He said I should throw a mattress up against the back and if that made a difference then I probably would.


3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
Re: Room acoustic question
bdpf #317037 07/29/10 01:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
Hi Bruno and all,

This has been a really interesting discussion, however, without an SPL meter and actually visiting your room, it's very difficult to determine what's going on. I threw out some of my own speculations as to what might be happening, and here's another one to "chew" on:

I do know that in our hearing system there is a muscle in the ear that attenuates hearing sensitivity when we are chewing food so we won't be deafened by the sound of our teeth grinding away on food. I once talked about this with Dr. Floyd Toole and I seem to recall him saying that our ears actually go into distortion when confronted with extremely loud sounds. I don't have Dr. Toole's book with me and I don't recall if he deals with this subject, however, I will email him and run this subject by him to see what he has to say.

In my own experience with loud sound or music, if I don't cover my ears, use ear plugs or get away from the very loud sound, what I subjectively experience is a kind of intolerable blurring and "distortion" if you will, of the music.

Regards,
Alan


Alan Lofft,
Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
Re: Room acoustic question
alan #317038 07/29/10 01:53 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
I've heard that ear distortion too at loud concerts, it does sound a lot like clipping.

That muscle you're talking about, it can also attenuate continuous loud sounds. But something like a hammering, gun shots, or other sudden, loud bursts don't cause the muscle to tighten up at all, or else too late. Those types of sounds can be very damaging.


Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011
Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8
Sony PS4, surround backs
-Chris
Re: Room acoustic question
ClubNeon #317039 07/29/10 02:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
You're absolutely correct, Club Neon.


Alan Lofft,
Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
Re: Room acoustic question
ClubNeon #317046 07/29/10 08:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
Hi all,

Dr. Toole replied to my email, and has gone into considerable detail about Bruno's situation and the non-linear nature of the ear with high-volume playback.

Floyd Toole responds:

"The following comments assume that no clipping or distortion is being generated within the power amp. Several comments in the forum correctly note that a 4 ohms load impedance is close to the current limiting spec for lots of receivers, so this is a very real possibility. BTW, when listening to music clean clipping is hard to hear until it exceeds about 6 dB, which allows us to get away with undersized amps for non-critical applications. However, when it does become audible virtually all aspects of sound quality are seriously degraded. Also, some amps don't "clean clip", Power supply voltages sag, causing several problems, or they can revert to a protective mode that does strange things.

Let's look at what room acoustics can do. Bruno's addition of the rug obviously reduced the overall reverberation time in the room, making it more acceptable (ideally the reverberation time should be less than 0.5 s at mid frequencies). However, being on the floor, it can do nothing to change reflections in the horizontal plane - i.e. among the walls. Our ears are in the horizontal plane, and therefore are more sensitive to these reflections than to those in the vertical plane, where the new rug would have it dominant effect..

Now, to get into imaging we need to be aware that imaging will be most "clear", most "sharp" when the direct sound is the dominant factor. The more reflections in the horizontal plane that are audible, the more decorrelated, or confused, are the sounds arriving at the two ears. A certain amount of this is highly desirable, adding a pleasant sense of ambiance, or "air" around the instruments, called in the scientific literature "ASW - Apparent Source Width". However, too much of this results in what Bruno describes: "the sound became more "blurry". Why does this occur when the volume is turned up? Because more of the lower level reflections become audible; they have been elevated above the audible hearing threshold. Grunt's comment about the highs being annoying in a live room are part of this. Most high frequency sounds are transient in nature and they draw attention to themselves, making the reflections more distracting, and the soundstage more "blurry".

Also, as Alan points out, the ears become increasingly non-linear at high sound levels and we are less able to discriminate fine details, both spectral and spatial. In the reverse direction, as you turn the volume down, the soundstage gets progressively more simplified, until almost all sense of "air", space and envelopment is gone. This is why we recommend that serious listening - foreground listening - be done at a moderately high level; but not too high, obviously.

So, how can this situation be improved in Bruno's room?

Nowhere in these discussions did I learn where Bruno's head is with respect to the rear wall. If there is a bare wall close behind the listener, all bets are off. The first thing to do is to place a broadband absorber behind the head - something fibrous (a cushion, fiberglass, etc. that is not less than 4 inches thick). Reflections from the back wall corrupt the perception of the front soundstage. We tend to get tied into knots worrying about where we put the loudspeakers, and then sit down in a chair backed up against a rear wall. This is not logical, right?

If this is not an issue, I suggest more furniture, or more acoustical treatment, mostly on the side walls. Either or both will be beneficial. In general, surface irregularities - bookcases, display cases, tilted pictures, etc - are useful, as are purchased "diffusers", so long as they are moderately thick (ignore the "toy" diffusers that are only 2-3 inches thick - they only work at tweeter frequencies). A certain amount of absorbing material may be needed if the room is too live, but don't overdo it; excessively dead rooms are not pleasant places in which to spend time. Scattering the sound using furniture or irregular surfaces makes whatever absorption that is in the room work harder, and the sound energy is preserved.

Of course, all of this and more is explained in my book: "Sound Reproduction", Focal Press 2008."

Good luck,
Floyd


Alan Lofft,
Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
Re: Room acoustic question
alan #317049 07/29/10 09:07 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
So now I've learned from the top guy that not only does my room suck because it's square, but also because my couch is up against the rear wall.

Someday, I'm gonna build me a room....


::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
Re: Room acoustic question
MarkSJohnson #317051 07/29/10 09:14 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
T
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
No, you're not.


bibere usque ad hilaritatem
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,944
Posts442,472
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 344 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4