|
2 registered (McDave, tomtuttle),
74
Guests and
2
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
8963 Members
11 Forums
22097 Topics
390602 Posts
Max Online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
|
|
|
#322701 - 09/15/10 05:55 PM
Furnaces: High Efficiency vs......
|
axiomite
Registered: 12/27/08
Posts: 6390
Loc: It's all about the location.
|
Has anyone here switched to a high efficiency furnace in the last few years? my gas furnace is now outdated and was wondering how much of a difference switching to a high efficiency would make....sales guy showed me a chart which said I'd save about $600-700 a year, but I'm skep-tee-kal. Anyone switch over?
_________________________
A person convinced against their will is of the same opinion still.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#322714 - 09/15/10 06:53 PM
Re: Furnaces: High Efficiency vs......
[Re: Adrian]
|
axiomite
Registered: 06/20/03
Posts: 7644
Loc: Tacoma
|
Shawn (real80sman) is an expert. My oversimplification of what he told me is that it depends upon how long you plan to stay in your house. The longer you stay, the more easily you can justify upgrades, including increased efficiency. I'd send Shawn a PM.
_________________________
We are a whole community of "that guy" - StPatGuy
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#322716 - 09/15/10 06:59 PM
Re: Furnaces: High Efficiency vs......
[Re: tomtuttle]
|
axiomite
Registered: 08/25/04
Posts: 5256
Loc: Bowmanville, Ontario, Canada
|
I'm on my second super-duper-high-efficiency furnace. My impression is that you are better off spending the extra $$ on insulation and drapes, unless you want the super-quiet super-electricity-efficient servo fan that some of them come with.
My first was a Lennox which was too expensive but worked really well (even though I ended up getting one size larger than I needed, my fault, long story), the second was a (Bryant ? something starting with B) which has worked well but which seems to have a less efficient & louder fan.
My recollection is that there are basically 3 levels - 80% efficiency, ~90% efficiency, and ~95% efficiency. If that's still the case, the 90%'ers seemed like a good deal if your furnace runs a lot during winter, but I wouldn't bother with the 95%'er (despite buying 2 of them ;)).
If your winters are moderate then it's hard to justify spending a lot more money on efficiency. You're going to save maybe 12% of your annual heating bill going from an 80 to a 90, so saving 600/yr implies that your heating bill is 5000/yr (which sounds high to say the least).
One other obvious point -- smaller furnaces running longer tend to make for more comfortable houses and lower fuel bills. If you size the furnace to keep your house toasty on the "coldest day in 5 years" that's probably bigger than you need... next time I would go with something sized to "keep the house comfortable on the colder days running most of the time" and put on a sweater or light a fire on the occasional freeze-ups. I guess having the furnace burning relatively more of the time would translate into a shorter heat-exchanger life but I've never actually heard that discussed.
Edited by bridgman (09/15/10 07:05 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#322723 - 09/15/10 07:31 PM
Re: Furnaces: High Efficiency vs......
[Re: bridgman]
|
axiomite
Registered: 12/27/08
Posts: 6390
Loc: It's all about the location.
|
Thanks guys. My gas bill in recent years has been around $1200 to $1500 annually(also runs hot water heater), so I can't really see how getting a high efficiency furnace is going to nearly cut that in half. I've been told that the high efficiency furnaces are more troublesome than many of the older units on top of that so I'm leaning towards keeping what I've got, despite it being "outdated".
Hmmm....now I just read Brian's post.....
Edited by Adrian (09/15/10 07:32 PM)
_________________________
A person convinced against their will is of the same opinion still.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#322727 - 09/15/10 07:41 PM
Re: Furnaces: High Efficiency vs......
[Re: bridgman]
|
connoisseur
Registered: 06/23/07
Posts: 3915
Loc: The Papal Apartments
|
I purchased the Trane XV90 a couple years ago, along with a Lifebreath HRV. If you have the finances, Adrian, I'd really consider a HRV; pretty sure they're code in all new homes now. If I was purchasing a new furnace or HRV, I'd get the more efficient ECM motor.
_________________________
Goodnight oracle Bob. Here's your bedtime glass of warm milk with Viagra and OxyContin.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#322736 - 09/15/10 07:59 PM
Re: Furnaces: High Efficiency vs......
[Re: PopeBobAltarBoy]
|
connoisseur
Registered: 06/23/07
Posts: 3915
Loc: The Papal Apartments
|
Yep, same here, absolutely no problems in probably 5 years (not a couple I guess). My furnace cost $5000, but I didn't care about the savings over time and whether I'd gain it back, it was solely based on lessening my footprint.
_________________________
Goodnight oracle Bob. Here's your bedtime glass of warm milk with Viagra and OxyContin.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#322747 - 09/15/10 08:13 PM
Re: Furnaces: High Efficiency vs......
[Re: PopeBobAltarBoy]
|
axiomite
Registered: 06/22/03
Posts: 6691
Loc: The Peoples Republic of Il.
|
It's been a while since I had a furnace put in but back then the cost of the unit was far to high to make up the difference in savings. I went with the 80% efficiency unit.
_________________________
Rick
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|