Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: M50's vs M22's
lex #326695 10/27/10 02:17 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
I'm designing a perforated screen setup in a downstairs room. What screen are you going with? I've got my eye on one right now, but the price runs a little high at 3 grand. It is the weave instead of the perforations and that drives the cost up. The advantage of it is it attenuates 2 db across all frequencys so no sound quality is lost.

Re: M50's vs M22's
CatBrat #326703 10/27/10 03:07 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 28
lex Offline OP
hobbyist
OP Offline
hobbyist
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 28
I'll be building my own screen - just haven't decided on the material yet.

Re: M50's vs M22's
lex #326728 10/27/10 05:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
I was going to suggest using an M3 or dual M3's(one above and one below the display) as a center to match up to the M50's.

If the M60's were possible why not the M80s and have the best midrange out of the M22 and even better bass response? The M22 sub combo lacks a little upper bass feel that the M80s bring to the equation. I went this very same route, started with M22, ordered M60s found the M60s lacking a little in the midrange compared to the M22 and then went for the M80s after some more comparison listening.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: M50's vs M22's
jakewash #326729 10/27/10 05:28 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
My thoughts exactly. That's why I'm planning on 3 M80 in-cabinet behind an acoustically transparent screen. The only problem is I need to go with an 8 foot screen (2.35:1) to completely hide the speakers, otherwise I'd have to let the ports drop down in sight below the screen. (Possibly covered with black cloth in a frame).
The only other drawback is the cost. About $2100 for 3 M80's, but a little waiting and getting a theater later rather than sooner will be well worth the wait.

Re: M50's vs M22's
CatBrat #326740 10/27/10 07:48 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 212
S
local
Offline
local
S
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 212
Originally Posted By: CatBrat
The only problem is I need to go with an 8 foot screen (2.35:1) to completely hide the speakers, otherwise I'd have to let the ports drop down in sight below the screen.


Everyone has problems. Some problems are better to have than others. I wish my only Home Theatre problem was that I *had* to go with an 8' screen!

smile

snazzed


M22, VP150, QS8 <--all v2
Sub: Outlaw LFM1-Plus
Denon AVR1910, Sony X900-65"
Re: M50's vs M22's
snazzed #326741 10/27/10 07:52 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
Originally Posted By: snazzed
Originally Posted By: CatBrat
The only problem is I need to go with an 8 foot screen (2.35:1) to completely hide the speakers, otherwise I'd have to let the ports drop down in sight below the screen.


Everyone has problems. Some problems are better to have than others. I wish my only Home Theatre problem was that I *had* to go with an 8' screen!

smile



snazzed


Let me rephrase that. One of the many problems that I have....

Re: M50's vs M22's
CatBrat #326826 10/28/10 08:13 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 28
lex Offline OP
hobbyist
OP Offline
hobbyist
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 28
Well folks, I just measured my space downstairs and I mis-spoke earlier. The room is actually 19'x19'x8' at the smallest (could go 20'x19'x9' - but I would like to sound proof it a little bit). So, having said that, are the M22's too small for the fronts and center? The HT wizard on this site recommends M60's at the very least. I may have to reconsider my design. I do want plenty of low end power, so the Ep600 or even Ep800 I will now look at again.

Re: M50's vs M22's
lex #326827 10/28/10 08:23 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
Personally, I would go with whatever you can afford and will fit. The M80's will sound better than the M60's.
The M60's will sound better than the M22's.
The M22's will sound better than the M2's.

etc...

The M3's and the M50's are probably in the same league, with diminished mid-range and a bass hump.


Last edited by CatBrat; 10/28/10 08:25 PM.
Re: M50's vs M22's
CatBrat #326845 10/29/10 02:38 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
Do you think the M50s have a bass hump ? My understanding was that they were pretty flat at the low end, ie more like an M60 than an M3.

IIRC there is a response chart on the Axiom web site but I'm having trouble getting into the site right now.


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: M50's vs M22's
bridgman #326846 10/29/10 02:41 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928


Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,473
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (chapin99), 681 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4