|
5 registered (BrenR, Ian, dakkon, CV, Ken.C),
52
Guests and
2
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
8973 Members
11 Forums
22143 Topics
391600 Posts
Max Online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
|
|
|
#326690 - 10/27/10 09:54 AM
Re: 5.1 or 6.1 with QS8's
[Re: lex]
|
connoisseur
Registered: 02/06/09
Posts: 3291
Loc: Western Maryland, USA
|
I have QS8s to the direct sides of the listening area. When used alone, pans of the surround channel seem to go over-head rather than around behind. Using my old surround speakers for the surround backs (and always having them enabled with Prologic IIx processing) provides a more stable rear image.
It is possible that moving the side surrounds back a couple feet would accomplish the same thing without need for rear speakers.
I have to say, even with the old speakers, I really like the seamless sound field I get for surround effects.
While it is possible that you could get by with two M2s back there, I wouldn't put a single mono-pole speaker directly behind your head. This also causes auditory confusion, and sounds directly behind can be misinterpreted as coming from in front.
EDIT: How far will you be seated from the rear wall? Closer, it is better to use a diffuse speaker like the QS8, but farther direct radiators will be fine.
Edited by ClubNeon (10/27/10 09:55 AM)
_________________________
Pioneer VSX-1018AH-K, PDP-5020FD, DV-79AVi Axiom M22s, VP150, QS8s Sony PS3, surround backs -Chris
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#326697 - 10/27/10 10:31 AM
Re: 5.1 or 6.1 with QS8's
[Re: lex]
|
connoisseur
Registered: 02/06/09
Posts: 3291
Loc: Western Maryland, USA
|
10 feet is a pretty good distance. Mono-poles, e.g. M2s, will work very well there. That would save you some cash over a pair of QS8s, but a single QS8 is cheaper than a pair of M2s.
_________________________
Pioneer VSX-1018AH-K, PDP-5020FD, DV-79AVi Axiom M22s, VP150, QS8s Sony PS3, surround backs -Chris
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#326705 - 10/27/10 11:16 AM
Re: 5.1 or 6.1 with QS8's
[Re: lex]
|
connoisseur
Registered: 02/06/09
Posts: 3291
Loc: Western Maryland, USA
|
With a 10 foot distance, I'd go with the M2s. I have a 7.5' distance, and my old Sony surrounds fill in very well with the diffuse QS8s on the sides.
You'll want to place the M2s toward the edges of the listening area on the back wall. For example, I have rears just about lined up with (slightly wider) the arms of the couch.
And as I was saying, with the use of rear surrounds, and Prologic IIx (or DTS NEO:6) you can place the QS8s directly to the sides of the listening area, so the flat between the tweeters is lined up with with the listener's ears.
_________________________
Pioneer VSX-1018AH-K, PDP-5020FD, DV-79AVi Axiom M22s, VP150, QS8s Sony PS3, surround backs -Chris
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#326721 - 10/27/10 12:59 PM
Re: 5.1 or 6.1 with QS8's
[Re: lex]
|
connoisseur
Registered: 02/06/09
Posts: 3291
Loc: Western Maryland, USA
|
The included T-bracket worked perfectly for me when mounting the QS8.
The M2, on the other hand, is going to require a little bit of work. They have a port on the rear, and need a couple inches of clearance. Axiom's Full Metal Brackets will work great, but are a little expensive.
_________________________
Pioneer VSX-1018AH-K, PDP-5020FD, DV-79AVi Axiom M22s, VP150, QS8s Sony PS3, surround backs -Chris
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#326723 - 10/27/10 01:11 PM
Re: 5.1 or 6.1 with QS8's
[Re: Capn_Pickard]
|
connoisseur
Registered: 12/04/06
Posts: 3569
Loc: Nirvana
|
Hi Lex how about I try to create more confusion for you.
I’ve done lots of experimenting with 5.1 (QS8s), 6.1 (QS8 surrounds and either a QS8, M22 or VP150 rear) and 7.1 (QS8 surrounds, M22 or QS8 rears). My experience indicates that what works best depends most on the shape of the room and relative seating positions to the side and rear walls.
In a relatively square room where the side and rear walls are close to equal distance from the seating I’ve found that by placing the 5.1 surround speakers farther back they create a phantom rear image that has even sounded better to me than 6.1 or 7.1 while still maintaining a seamless side surround stage.
In a longer more narrow room where the side walls are closer to the seating than the rear walls 5.1 surround speakers can’t be placed optimally to create both side and rear surround images without there being gaps in the 360 degree soundstage.
6.1 helps fill in the rear soundstage some while still allowing for optimal side surround speaker placement. However, as I believe Alan has pointed it can be difficult to tell if the sound from a single speaker directly behind you is actually coming from behind or from directly in front. In this respect a single QS8 performs a little better than a single M22 or M2 since it spreads out the sound behind you better.
While IMO 6.1 can sound a little better than 5.1 in a narrow room it’s not even close to how much better 7.1 sounds. As for QS8 vs M22, or M2 working better as 7.1 rear speakers I use to think that if there was enough room behind your seats (about 5 or more feet) then direct radiating speakers like the M2 would sound about as good as QS8 speakers. I’ve done a lot more listening since then and changed my mind feeling the even with 8 feet behind me in my present room the QS8 clearly outperform the M22 and M2 speakers in the 7.1 rear duties.
So if money is not an issue I highly recommend you stick with QS8 speakers for both side and rear surround duties.
Cheers, Dean
_________________________
3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|