Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 6 of 37 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 36 37
Re: Sneak Peak: VP160 Prototype
BlueJays1 #355645 09/27/11 11:15 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 64
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 64
I think I agree. The configuration I suggest would be a 3-way that would x-over to the 4" for midrange. I suppose this could be limiting. Although I don't think there would be any timbre difficulties since many people use QS 4's with M22's and they have the 4" driver. I am interested to see how this new center evoloves.

Re: Sneak Peak: VP160 Prototype
powerwindow #355646 09/27/11 11:37 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116
I know Axiom has mentioned before they like the midrange capabilities of the 5.25". More so than the 6.5 but I don't think they ever mentioned the 4". One driver complement a fellow member JohnK suggested was a dual 4" in a WM(^T^)MW.


I’m armed and I’m drinking. You don’t want to listen to advice from me, amigo.

-Max Payne
Re: Sneak Peak: VP160 Prototype
BlueJays1 #355647 09/27/11 11:47 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 64
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 64
Ahh, now you're really shaking things up. Would the woofers be the 5.25" drivers? If so, it would be like a baby 180. smile This could be interesting as it would lengthen the box. Looking at the 180 prototype, I do think it appears too 'boxy.'

Re: Sneak Peak: VP160 Prototype
powerwindow #355648 09/27/11 11:58 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116
Now that's an important question and one I could not answer.


I’m armed and I’m drinking. You don’t want to listen to advice from me, amigo.

-Max Payne
Re: Sneak Peak: VP160 Prototype
BlueJays1 #355651 09/28/11 01:14 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
As a former owner of QS4s as well as a current owner of M50s, M80s, etc, etc, etc, etc, I prefer the midrange of the 5.25>3>6.5>4. Bearing in mind, of course, that my 5.25" mids are v2s, the 3s are v3s, the 6.5s are v1s, and the 4s were v2s.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Sneak Peak: VP160 Prototype
CatBrat #355658 09/28/11 02:33 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Brian, keep in mind that the main purpose of the new design is to have the tweeter and mid-range aligned vertically, and putting the tweeter and mid-range beside each other would defeat this purpose. This would be little different acoustically from taking the M60 and setting it on its side.

Several Axiom competitors offer such a W T/M W arrangement, such as Aperion , Paradigm and PSB .


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: Sneak Peak: VP160 Prototype
BlueJays1 #355659 09/28/11 02:44 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Yes, a couple years ago Blue Jay(aka Dr. horse)and I discussed center speaker designs and one of the suggestions I mentioned was an arrangement for a W T/MM W, which would use the tweeter and two 4" mid-ranges grouped as closely as possible in a triangular configuration. This was pure speculation, and the benefits(if any)of such an arrangement are unclear, beyond doubling up the mid-range drivers.

I might note that the competitors' W T/M W speakers that I linked above do make use of 4-4 1/2" mid-ranges which helps keep enclosure height down.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: Sneak Peak: VP160 Prototype
Amie #355667 09/28/11 06:25 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,749
Likes: 37
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,749
Likes: 37
Originally Posted By: Amie
Well, the first prototype is designed, cut and built, and heading into the testing room! What do you think?


Side view


Front view


OK, it's clunky looking. Focal JM Lab Electras look a bit better.


and of course the B&W Nautilus center speaker raises the tweeter above the driver line



and of course the idea of my Frankenspeaker DIY project using Axiom 6.5" drivers is the tweeter is above the speaker line. Axiom could place the 5.25" driver where the horn tweeter is and raise its tweeter to where the supertweeter sits.

[img:center]Photobucket[/img]

I think it would make the unit look much better and get rid of the bulk.

Last edited by 2x6spds; 09/28/11 06:26 AM.

Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.
Re: Sneak Peak: VP160 Prototype
2x6spds #355668 09/28/11 11:14 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331
I've never cared for the stand-alone tweeter on top of the cabinet. It looks, to me, like they forgot it and said "oh well, lets just nail it down up here." wink But, that's just my personal perspective. YMMV.


Jack

"People generally quarrel because they cannot argue." - G. K. Chesterton
Re: Sneak Peak: VP160 Prototype
Ajax #355673 09/28/11 12:22 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,443
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,443
Originally Posted By: Ajax
I've never cared for the stand-alone tweeter on top of the cabinet. It looks, to me, like they forgot it and said "oh well, lets just nail it down up here." wink But, that's just my personal perspective. YMMV.

Looks a little phallic to me?


"A fanatic is someone who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" Churchill
Page 6 of 37 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 36 37

Moderated by  alan, Andrew, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,940
Posts442,457
Members15,616
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 386 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4