Get Free, Friendly, Expert Advice
Call 1-866-244-8796 or email

Designed and Manufactured in Canada Since 1980


AxiomAudio Blog

Sneak Peek into Axiom’s Current Research and Development

Axiom’s Newest Speaker: The In-Ceiling M3

Outdoor Speaker Placement

Wall'O'Fame
Experimental Atmos
Greetings fellow Axiom owners...
Who's Online
0 registered (), 44 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Financing
Forum Stats
13322 Members
11 Forums
22894 Topics
404573 Posts

Max Online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
Top Posters
Ken.C 17781
pmbuko 16275
SirQuack 13335
CV 11208
MarkSJohnson 10898
Meanwhile On Facebook

󾓶 The first review of the LFR880s is out! "If you are adding or upgrading stere...

So much going on in this month's newsletter - new product announcements, a new v...

Love this comment from Doug T! "The M22 bookshelf speakers sound so clean and a...

󾓶 Andrew has spoken! Big update on the AxiomPlay Wireless Platform on the Axiom...

Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#359646 - 11/29/11 02:04 AM IN / ON wall speaker vs Cabinet & Standard version
Chevy Offline
old hand

Registered: 07/31/09
Posts: 95
Loc: Sherbrooke Qc Canada
Axiom spkrs sharing the same technicals specs
whatever the version:
bookshelf,floorstanding,in wall, on wall, in/on wall, or cabinet.

but, i wonder if they sound the same ???

Does anyone find that different version of the same spkr sounds different ??? confused

... having in wall or on wall spkr, is a space compromise, but is it a hearing compromise too ???
_________________________
Cambridge Audio 640r,M100,VP150v3,QS8v3,EP500v3

Top
#359649 - 11/29/11 08:20 AM Re: IN / ON wall speaker vs Cabinet & Standard version [Re: Chevy]
CatBrat Offline
axiomite

Registered: 08/05/09
Posts: 5869
Loc: Milky Way Galaxy
In my opinion they sound different, but my listening comparision is limited to the M22 on-wall vs. bookshelf. I find the bookshelf has a much smoother and even sound, whereas I've experienced some harshness with the on-wall at some upper frequencies that was unpleasant to my ears with some recordings. I didn't experience this with the bookshelf. I can't speak for the in/on wall, or the cabinet. The in/on wall should be an improvement and the cabinet should sound the same as the bookshelf version.

But, then again, others have registered no complaints with the on-wall speakers. It might be that I'm one of the rare individuals that have both.

Top
#359657 - 11/29/11 08:46 AM Re: IN / ON wall speaker vs Cabinet & Standard version [Re: CatBrat]
BobKay Offline
connoisseur

Registered: 03/23/10
Posts: 3158
Loc: Massachusetts Badlands
Ken is now the most experienced person on this topic. Hey, Ken, does it sound any different off the wall?
_________________________
"Ya rolls the dice and ya takes yer chanskes."
Popeye

Top
#359660 - 11/29/11 08:59 AM Re: IN / ON wall speaker vs Cabinet & Standard version [Re: BobKay]
Ken.C Offline
shareholder in the making

Registered: 05/03/03
Posts: 17781
Loc: NoVA
I'm told it has a lot of boom.
_________________________
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!

Top
#359671 - 11/29/11 10:40 AM Re: IN / ON wall speaker vs Cabinet & Standard version [Re: Ken.C]
SirQuack Offline
shareholder in the making

Registered: 01/29/04
Posts: 13335
Loc: Iowa
Yes the inwall vs onwall vs bookshelf all have a bit of a different sound to them, basically in the bass regions. This is due to cabinet size difference.
_________________________
M80s-VP180-QS8s-EP600-2xEP350 Denon3808 Outlaw7700
M22-OWM22-VP100-Denon2805
Audio Nirvana

Top
#359688 - 11/29/11 12:44 PM Re: IN / ON wall speaker vs Cabinet & Standard version [Re: SirQuack]
Chevy Offline
old hand

Registered: 07/31/09
Posts: 95
Loc: Sherbrooke Qc Canada
smile SirQuack , that's what i suspect about, the cabinet size diff.
_________________________
Cambridge Audio 640r,M100,VP150v3,QS8v3,EP500v3

Top
#359696 - 11/29/11 01:48 PM Re: IN / ON wall speaker vs Cabinet & Standard version [Re: Chevy]
SirQuack Offline
shareholder in the making

Registered: 01/29/04
Posts: 13335
Loc: Iowa
I did some comparisons to my onwall v3's versus regular m22's v2's, and the highs/mids seemed similar. The regular M22's had better bass. With the crossover set correctly with a good sub, they both sounded good. My reg m22's sounded fuller, in my opinion.
_________________________
M80s-VP180-QS8s-EP600-2xEP350 Denon3808 Outlaw7700
M22-OWM22-VP100-Denon2805
Audio Nirvana

Top
#359710 - 11/29/11 02:50 PM Re: IN / ON wall speaker vs Cabinet & Standard version [Re: SirQuack]
CatBrat Offline
axiomite

Registered: 08/05/09
Posts: 5869
Loc: Milky Way Galaxy
That's about the same comparison I had, except around the female voice region of the on-wall M22 v2. It didn't bother me at first, but a visitor pointed it out to me one day that she didn't like the way it sounded (too bright), so then I did a lot of a/b testing with various material between on-wall and bookshelf and the bookshelf also had a smoother response in the upper regions as well.

Then with some later testing with a RC sound meter, I discovered that the on-wall had comb filtering problems, whereas the bookshelf did not. While playing a constant tone, I would slowly walk the sound meter across the room. With the on-wall, it would quickly fluctuate up and down. With the bookshelf, it remained steady.

I attribute these abnormalities possibly to the proximity of the speakers to the wall. With the wall interacting with the sound. I don't know how this might affect the in-cabinet or in-wall units.

It's possible some of these problems have been corrected with the v3 units.

Top



Moderator:  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Home  |  Corporate Info  |  Products  |  Message Board  |  FAQs  |  Warranty  |  Site Map  |  Privacy Statement   |  Contact Us

©2014 Colquhoun Audio Laboratories Limited
All Rights Reserved.