Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Mac users running windows....
Lampshade #365862 02/06/12 02:22 AM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,236
connoisseur
OP Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,236
The next problem: is Windows really $200 or can I find it for less money.


M3 and
M80
Re: Mac users running windows....
Lampshade #365863 02/06/12 02:28 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
You can get an OEM license for much less than that. Look at Newegg.com.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Mac users running windows....
Lampshade #365877 02/06/12 03:29 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
About 2-3 weeks ago, I installed Windows 7, Professional 64 bit OEM for $140 from Newegg.

Re: Mac users running windows....
Ken.C #365943 02/07/12 02:36 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
Originally Posted By: Ken.C
That's prohibited by Apple licensing, which all the virtualization vendors are honoring. So, in short, it's not possible.
If that happend for Microsoft there would be a ton of lawsuits.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: Mac users running windows....
Lampshade #365944 02/07/12 02:57 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
I doubt it. If MS says you can't use their OS virtualized, that's what they say--and they're perfectly within their rights. Same deal with Apple.

I personally think Apple is being foolish, but I understand why they're doing it.

Their main business on the Mac side is hardware; the OS is just gravy (which is why it costs $40 now--that's the upgrade price, there is no full version SKU.)

And you can virtualize MacOS, it's just that you have to virtualize it on Apple hardware, which I guarantee pretty much no one is going to do, at least in a server environment. You can even run ESXi on an Xserve--it's cleared by both companies. Unfortunately, they don't make those any more.

Hell, for that matter, if Microsoft said you had to pay more for a version of Windows that you would run virtualized, they're perfectly within their rights to do that.

Last edited by Ken.C; 02/07/12 02:58 AM.

I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Mac users running windows....
Lampshade #365949 02/07/12 05:40 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
I see what you are saying, makes sense, wasn't really thinking that through.

Although it looks like VMware is allowing it anyway.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,473
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 661 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4