Get Free, Friendly, Expert Advice
Call 1-866-244-8796 or email

Designed and Manufactured in Canada Since 1980


AxiomAudio Blog

Sneak Peek into Axiom’s Current Research and Development

Axiom’s Newest Speaker: The In-Ceiling M3

Outdoor Speaker Placement

Wall'O'Fame
Experimental Atmos
Greetings fellow Axiom owners...
Who's Online
2 registered (CatBrat, J. B.), 116 Guests and 6 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Financing
Forum Stats
13322 Members
11 Forums
22898 Topics
404612 Posts

Max Online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
Top Posters
Ken.C 17782
pmbuko 16280
SirQuack 13337
CV 11208
MarkSJohnson 10900
Meanwhile On Facebook

󾓶 The first review of the LFR880s is out! "If you are adding or upgrading stere...

So much going on in this month's newsletter - new product announcements, a new v...

Love this comment from Doug T! "The M22 bookshelf speakers sound so clean and a...

󾓶 Andrew has spoken! Big update on the AxiomPlay Wireless Platform on the Axiom...

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#392274 - 04/21/13 08:57 PM M3v3
johnaudio Offline
newbie

Registered: 04/21/13
Posts: 3
Hello,
I was wondering if someone could assist. I purchased a pair of m3v3’s about 6 months or so ago, and now with well over 100 burn-in hours on them and the sound of cymbals, guitars, etc. sounds tiny to me. It doesn’t sound right. With the same setup and equipment I had been using the m3 v1’s (which I loved) before I gave them to my father, and those did not sound like these do as far as I remember. I also swapped the v3’s out temporarily with a second pair of speakers in the house (not used anymore) from a Yamaha mini system and the highs even from these cheapies did sound more real to me. Is there some sort of tweak other than the usual IC, speaker cable, etc. swap / replacement that I can do? Again, the same exact equipment was used all along even with the older axioms. For example some sort of cap or resistor added to the tweeter or something? Do I need more burn-in time?

Any help, suggestions will be much appreciated.

John

Top
#392275 - 04/21/13 09:18 PM Re: M3v3 [Re: johnaudio]
JohnK Offline
shareholder in the making

Registered: 05/11/02
Posts: 10395
John, welcome(can always use another one). If what you term "tiny" means a lack of high frequencies, none of the steps you mention are meaningful. If any "burn-in" was necessary(doubtful), 100 seconds rather than 100 hours would be sufficient. An IC or speaker cable swap certainly shouldn't be considered "usual" and would have no effect.

Have you listened to each M3 individually to see if they both exhibit the problem? Can you play high frequency test tones to see if the tweeter is functioning at all on either or both of the speakers? Possibly an internal wire has come loose.

You can be assured that when it's operating correctly the tweeter on the M3v3s is if anything slightly superior to the previous model.
_________________________
-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.



Top
#392277 - 04/21/13 09:40 PM Re: M3v3 [Re: JohnK]
johnaudio Offline
newbie

Registered: 04/21/13
Posts: 3
Hi Johnk
Thank you very much for your feedback and suggestions. I've listened to both speakers and they sound identical even when I swapped them around. I am just not good with audio terms at all, forgive me. By tiny (maybe thin is the right word?), I mean, high hats, steel guitar strings notes just don't linger, the tone vanishes quickly when compared with the other speakers. Hi frequency is definitely there but it just doesn't sound right to me. Maybe its personal preference, but I seriously am considering of getting my old m3 v1's back from my dad.

Thanks again

Top
#392280 - 04/21/13 10:00 PM Re: M3v3 [Re: johnaudio]
JohnK Offline
shareholder in the making

Registered: 05/11/02
Posts: 10395
John, it's of course nearly impossible for someone to diagnose at long range "just doesn't sound right". If both speakers have the identical problem it's extremely unlikely for some defect to have occurred in both, but this can't be some inherent characteristic of the v3 tweeter. Alan has reported that it has a small but noticeable edge on the previous tweeter.

If there aren't any later replies here which catch something that I can't at the moment, contact Axiom directly for possible advice.
_________________________
-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.



Top
#392282 - 04/21/13 10:16 PM Re: M3v3 [Re: johnaudio]
tomtuttle Offline
axiomite

Registered: 06/20/03
Posts: 8290
Loc: Tacoma
The only other things I would offer are...

You don't mention source material.

You don't mention the rest of the signal chain.

While it is "identical" to your other scenarios, the high resolution of the current models might be revealing weaknesses in the rest of the chain.
_________________________
bibere usque ad hilaritatem

Top
#392292 - 04/22/13 03:17 AM Re: M3v3 [Re: johnaudio]
exlabdriver Offline
connoisseur

Registered: 09/07/11
Posts: 1027
My M3v3s in one of my audio only systems are driven by a new, but low end Sony Stereo Receiver with an older Sony 5 Disc CD Player - certainly not audiophile stuff. Their high end sounds fine to me - not unlike my M2s & M22s that use the same tweeter.

If it is not your source material, maybe it is something to do with the interaction of the speakers with your room. Perhaps experimenting with moving the speakers slightly - toeing in, etc - might improve things...

TAM

Top
#392301 - 04/22/13 08:07 AM Re: M3v3 [Re: johnaudio]
Murph Offline
axiomite

Registered: 10/05/06
Posts: 6833
Loc: PEI, Canada
You may also want to double check and/or experiment with the settings on your receiver. Are you using an auto-calibration program that might need to be run again? Are you using a particular EQ or sound mode that might be effecting things? I once accidentally set my EQ to "flat" and was extremely frustrated with the horrible effect it created compared to my previous settings, until I finally discovered my mistake.
_________________________
With great power comes Awesome irresponsibility.

Top
#392306 - 04/22/13 09:16 AM Re: M3v3 [Re: Murph]
johnaudio Offline
newbie

Registered: 04/21/13
Posts: 3
Thank you folks for all your helpful comments and suggestions. My system consists of an NAD c326bee integrated and a c515bee cdp connected through analysis plus oval 9 speaker wire, tara labs vector ic’s, gutwire and ultralink power cables. I did play with the settings of the amp and moved the speakers around, including experimenting with isolation cones etc. Music material is generally acoustic blues (no rap, heavy metal, pop). That’s it. Maybe these speakers reveal weaknesses in my system. It is what it is I guess.

Thank you all very much once again.

Top
#392308 - 04/22/13 09:53 AM Re: M3v3 [Re: johnaudio]
CatBrat Online   content
axiomite

Registered: 08/05/09
Posts: 5872
Loc: Milky Way Galaxy
For wire, I just use Axiom's 12 gauge bulk wire with banana connectors. Couldn't sound better.

Top
#392313 - 04/22/13 10:47 AM Re: M3v3 [Re: johnaudio]
MarkSJohnson Offline
shareholder in the making

Registered: 09/27/04
Posts: 10901
Loc: Central NH
John, the best process is to go through everything to eliminate variables.

Does your dad live close enough to bring his speakers to your house for comparison there, as well as bringing your speakers to HIS house to compare on his system?

You need to confirm that both tweeters are working and that the system is not imparting a change of sound.

Comparing the new M3s to the old ones is beneficial in removing variables.
_________________________
::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >



Moderator:  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Home  |  Corporate Info  |  Products  |  Message Board  |  FAQs  |  Warranty  |  Site Map  |  Privacy Statement   |  Contact Us

©2014 Colquhoun Audio Laboratories Limited
All Rights Reserved.