Get Free, Friendly, Expert Advice
Call 1-866-244-8796 or email

Designed and Manufactured in Canada Since 1980


AxiomAudio Blog

Blind Listening Tests

Sneak Peek into Axiom’s Current Research and Development

Axiom’s Newest Speaker: The In-Ceiling M3

Wall'O'Fame
Experimental Atmos
Greetings fellow Axiom owners...
Who's Online
3 registered (medic8r, brwsaw, nickbuol), 43 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Financing
Forum Stats
13323 Members
11 Forums
22902 Topics
404786 Posts

Max Online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
Top Posters
Ken.C 17783
pmbuko 16283
SirQuack 13337
CV 11212
MarkSJohnson 10911
Meanwhile On Facebook

Ian and Andrew join in the debate about whether or not people want uncompressed...

󾓶 The first review of the LFR880s is out! "If you are adding or upgrading stere...

So much going on in this month's newsletter - new product announcements, a new v...

Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#393 - 10/26/01 11:58 PM Sub Question
tyggrr Offline
newbie

Registered: 10/25/01
Posts: 2
Loc: Welland, Ontario, Canada
My current system is composed of a Yamaha RXV596 receiver with Axiom 1.5 mains (1988), Axiom AX 1.2 centre and Axiom QS4 rears. I would like to add a sub and am not sure what to go with. I found an AX 1.5 sub (triangular older design) which I could get for approx $300-$350 Canadian. Would this be an adequate sub for my system or would one of the newer ones (EP125 or EP175) be more appropriate. What differences are there with the newer design over the older triangular design. My room is approx. 12ft x 20ft and my seating is across the narrower (12ft) portion of the room from the system.

Also, I will eventually be going with either the M3Ti's or M22Ti's as my mains (haven't decided yet) once I have a bit more money. Thanks for any advice that would help me make my decision.



Top
#394 - 10/28/01 12:21 PM Re: Sub Question
Ian Offline
President
aficionado

Registered: 03/13/01
Posts: 808
I would suggest the EP175. Though the EP125 would work great with your current system when you go to the M3s or M22s you would probably be happier with the larger EP175.

Ian Colquhoun
President & Chief Engineer
_________________________
Ian Colquhoun
President & Chief Engineer

Top
#395 - 10/28/01 06:53 PM Re: Sub Question
tyggrr Offline
newbie

Registered: 10/25/01
Posts: 2
Loc: Welland, Ontario, Canada
Thanks for the advice Ian.
I just have a couple more quick questions....
(1) What are the differences from the last generation of subwoofers to the EP series (e.g. power, compostion, etc.)?
(2) Why the change from the triangular design?
(3) If I could find one of the older designs what would be the equivalent model number to the EP175 and would it perform similarly.

Thanks for all your assistance.

Daryl :-)



Top
#396 - 10/29/01 06:18 AM Re: Sub Question
Ian Offline
President
aficionado

Registered: 03/13/01
Posts: 808
The most similar sub from the last series to the EP175 would be the AX500. The power levels are similar and they both use a 10" aluminum cone woofer. The EP175 has the vortex porting, which was not available in the last series, and eliminates port noise. The EP175 is front firing as opposed to rear. The ASW cabinet design is not used in the new subs because the advantages to this design are midrange improvements which do not affect the subs.

Ian Colquhoun
President & Chief Engineer
_________________________
Ian Colquhoun
President & Chief Engineer

Top



Moderator:  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Home  |  Corporate Info  |  Products  |  Message Board  |  FAQs  |  Warranty  |  Site Map  |  Privacy Statement   |  Contact Us

©2014 Colquhoun Audio Laboratories Limited
All Rights Reserved.