Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Re: NRC data show Energy & Paradigm better than Ax
#47159 05/27/04 11:30 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,854
R
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
R
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,854
Now I'm questioning my purchase of the Axioms. I stupidly actually LISTENED to the speakers (including the Paradigms) when all I apparently needed to do was download some charts and look at the lines. I honestly don't know what I was thinking.

Re: NRC data show Energy & Paradigm better than Axiom
#47160 05/28/04 05:55 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,041
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,041

Re: NRC data show Energy & Paradigm better than Axiom
#47161 05/28/04 08:03 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
I'm an expert?

Re: NRC data show Energy & Paradigm better than Axiom
#47162 05/28/04 08:07 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331
Don't let it go to your head! Did you bring this weather with you? (Inside joke folks. Peter just flew into Cleveland and it's cloudy, 57 degrees and I'm freezing my a$$ off.


Jack

"People generally quarrel because they cannot argue." - G. K. Chesterton
Re: NRC data show Energy & Paradigm better than Axiom
#47163 05/28/04 08:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
jbmjr,

Your statement, taken at face value, is misguided. Of course every speaker designer is always working to improve musical accuracy and fidelity of the products. But you should understand that the NRC curves must be viewed as a family of curves, and that they require careful interpretation by experts, read in context with data from double-blind listening tests of the particular speakers in question, especially if you are making comparisons between different brands and models.

Note also the date of the measurements. For example, the curves for the Axiom M80ti, measured by Soundstage in August, 2001, do not represent the performance of current production M80s. Speaker designers are always seeking to tweak the performance of models, and changes may occur in production. Part of my role at Axiom is to occasionally suggest small tweaks or refinements to the performance of a particular speaker, if it's achieveable without making other compromises.

Looking at one set of NRC curves in isolation is not very useful because the anechoic NRC curves do not tell the full story. The curves can be a reasonably good predictor of gross spectral aberrations or general trends in response. Some small irregularities can be insignificant in the upper octaves; but a nasty spike in a portion of the audio band where our ears are most sensitive (the midrange) may be quite audible. However, if the spike isn't repeated in the off-axis (45, 60, and 75-degree) measurements, it's unlikely to show up in the listening tests.

Moreover, small dips in response are inconsequential, whereas a large hump over a broad band of frequencies will almost always be heard in listening tests.

Even two different speakers that have generally similar, and smooth, frequency-response curves both on- and off-axis, will never sound identical in listening tests. "Similarly good," is a phrase I often used in blind tests where it was impossible to rank one speaker over the other, or they were ranked by a group of listeners within a few tenths of a point, which would make any tiny differences more likely the result of the listener location rather than inherent differences in the speakers.

The acoustics of speaker performance in rooms are so complex that technical measurements, at best, should only be used as a general guide. As much as we would all like the curves to be an absolute predictor, so the more obsessive part of our personality could say, "clearly, this is the best speaker," the science of speaker measurement is not there yet.

Regards,


Alan Lofft,
Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
Re: NRC data show Energy & Paradigm better than Ax
#47164 05/28/04 08:33 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 715
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 715
I don't think so Jack. I'm setting on the 11th floor of an office building here in downtown San Francisco and looking outside it's sunny and about 70.

jr


"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." C Hitchens
Re: NRC data show Energy & Paradigm better than Ax
#47165 05/28/04 09:20 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,016
B
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
B
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,016
i am sitting on the 5th floor, looking out.. it is partly cloudy, 10mph wind blowing west to east, and its about 93F degrees.

boat is already on the water, and i am heading to the lake as soon as i leave here in about 30 minutes.

ya'll have a good memorial weekend. i will!!!

bigjohn


EXCUSE ME, ARE YOU THE SINGING BUSH??
Re: NRC data show Energy & Paradigm better than Axiom
#47166 05/29/04 02:07 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 19
J
jbmjr Offline OP
frequent flier
OP Offline
frequent flier
J
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 19
I am just trying to decide which speakers to purchase, which is much harder than deciding on electronics.

Re: NRC data show Energy & Paradigm better than Axiom
#47167 05/29/04 02:36 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 19
J
jbmjr Offline OP
frequent flier
OP Offline
frequent flier
J
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 19
Alan, thank you for your explanation.

"Note also the date of the measurements. For example, the curves for the Axiom M80ti, measured by Soundstage in August, 2001, do not represent the performance of current production M80s"

Maybe you can have Soundstage measure newer versions of Axiom products to demonstrate their improved performance.




Re: NRC data show Energy & Paradigm better than Axiom
#47168 05/29/04 03:31 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
T
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
jbmjr, I've probably enjoyed my Friday evening libation too much to be objective, but this..
In reply to:

Maybe you can have Soundstage measure newer versions of Axiom products to demonstrate their improved performance.



strikes me as, at best, confrontational. I mean, why are you so much more fixated on graphs than on the listening experience? Either audition some Axioms somewhere, or with the return policy in mind, order some. Your crusade does not ring true to me.


bibere usque ad hilaritatem
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,940
Posts442,457
Members15,616
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 397 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4