How about making a QS12 (or 16)?
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 44
buff
|
OP
buff
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 44 |
With dual 6 1/2" mids for a better frequency response over the QS8's???
95hz doesn't cut it for me, but I'd not hesitate buying a dual 6 1/2" quadrapole surround!
|
|
|
Re: How about making a QS12 (or 16)?
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
Well, you can't please all the people all the time, can you?
|
|
|
Re: How about making a QS12 (or 16)?
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 44
buff
|
OP
buff
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 44 |
No. But I'm sure it would sell. Sell well. For people who overlook it due to it's lack of bass.
|
|
|
Re: How about making a QS12 (or 16)?
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
I would really like to see your impression of the QS8s after hearing them. Who knows? They may be quite adequate. Or more than adequate. Virtually every review I've read of them praises them as the ultimate surround speaker for any price.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: How about making a QS12 (or 16)?
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 521
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 521 |
Whether he liked(s) them doesn't really matter. He brings up a very valid point in that many people go off of statistics and charts to determine quality and accuracy. People will not buy a product if it was (supposedly) made in a country they don't like for crying out loud. So there must be many a people who pass up the QS8's because of statistical reasons.
|
|
|
Re: How about making a QS12 (or 16)?
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,703
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,703 |
since you cant tell what direction bass is comming from, im curious as to why the surround speakers need to go below 100hz
?
|
|
|
Re: How about making a QS12 (or 16)?
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Because people would (theoretically) have to crank up the sub's crossover so as not to "lose" that 20-40 Hz.
Assuming, of course, that they didn't have a Harman/Kardon which allows separate crossovers for all the channels...
Besides, it is debatable that below 100 Hz is where bass loses directionality. I prefer 60 Hz myself, but I have no problem living with 80. I doubt that the rolloff is so steep that I'd miss the 5 Hz.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: How about making a QS12 (or 16)?
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 427
devotee
|
devotee
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 427 |
um, when has sub 95Hz frequencies in the side surrounds ever been necessary. get a 7.1 reciever and place some M80s in the back surround channels for DVD-audio and SACD. but it is honestly not necessary for the side surrounds to go that low. That is what subs are for.
Also, considering the price of the QS8's, something bigger will probably be really expensive.
|
|
|
Re: How about making a QS12 (or 16)?
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,703
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,703 |
I guess I could see it for multichannel music... but movies are encoded to channel lower freq to fronts and sub not the surround channels.
|
|
|
Re: How about making a QS12 (or 16)?
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 19
frequent flier
|
frequent flier
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 19 |
Does anyone know how much information is in the 80-100Hz range in most movies' surround tracks?
Actually, I'd rather have Axiom make a center channel that covers 80-100 better before a surround that does. Even the VP150 leaves a noticeable dropoff there, I think about 6db in my room. (but I'm getting a receiver with variable crossover tonight, so I can set the cross to 90 or 100 if I want now...)
Bruce
Last edited by Bruce_Lowekamp; 06/15/04 05:12 PM.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,477
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
1 members (Kodiak),
1,105
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|