Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 146 of 172 1 2 144 145 146 147 148 171 172
Re: OT: politics
#54059 11/05/04 12:02 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
W
Wid Offline
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
W
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
In reply to:

I'm not as depressed anymore.




I'm glad your feeling better.I will say this Peter I do respect you and your opinons,and I do believe you are a good person as I do most who have debated their issuses here.


Rick


"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud

Re: OT: politics
#54060 11/05/04 12:13 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,703
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,703
In reply to:


That makes me so, so, sad. Thanks for twisting the knife guys!




OK thats just funny


Re: OT: politics *DELETED*
#54061 11/05/04 12:20 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
I deleted the post above because Riffman had already linked to the nicer, more gradiated map.

Re: OT: politics
#54062 11/05/04 12:30 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
OK. Here's a juxtaposition for ya:

2004 Electoral Results, by State:




The Antebellum United States of America, circa 1860:






Re: OT: politics
#54063 11/05/04 01:11 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
More wound-licking:

The Wall Street Journal points out, Bush's victory was "the narrowest win for a sitting president since Woodrow Wilson in 1916."

Re: OT: politics
#54064 11/05/04 02:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,016
B
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
B
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,016
HAHA... nice map comparisions there peter.. pretty interesting stuff..

bigjohn


EXCUSE ME, ARE YOU THE SINGING BUSH??
Re: OT: politics
#54065 11/05/04 05:44 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
How was this win more narrow than the win over Gore in 2000?

The 1860 map is supposed to show that today's Bush voters in the south are bigots? The actual reason for that juxtaposition is the southerners' perception that the Democratic Party represents urban residents, gays and minority interests more than those of rural and traditional America. And they're right.

By watching CNN and reading the NY Times articles that are reprinted in my local paper, it is clear to me that the Democrats have learned nothing from this election yet. Most are questioning what the Kerry campaign did "wrong", mainly in terms of election strategy and the attacks on the President, rather than looking to rein in the radical leftists in their party that dominate the headlines and provide easy targets for conservatives and moderates alike. Marxism, radical environmentalism, radical racial politics, atheism, increased taxation, etc... You expect normal people to vote for that?

The easiest way for democrats to win the Presidency would be to nominate a moderate southerner, like Clinton (Bill, not Hillary ).

Re: OT: politics
#54066 11/05/04 06:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,016
B
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
B
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,016
In reply to:

How was this win more narrow than the win over Gore in 2000?



the comment was "the narrowest win for a sitting president".. bush obviously didnt have the presidency in 2000. just a mis-read on your part, no biggie.

In reply to:

The 1860 map is supposed to show that today's Bush voters in the south are bigots?



no, but i think it points out the fact that the majority of republican voting states, still use the 'slave driving, good 'ole boy network' that was prevalent 140 years ago. its the backwords attitude that to keep one's self up, you gotta keep someone else down, and make sure to hook up all your buddies in the process. its just old, wrong thinking. but obviously, the republican party has embraced that section of the vote, and has made their directive clear. we will stay rich, and keep the poor, poor. and give all the billion dollar contract to all our old business partners. *pat on the back here*pat on the back there* everyones happy..

bigjohn






EXCUSE ME, ARE YOU THE SINGING BUSH??
Re: OT: politics
#54067 11/05/04 06:37 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
Thanks for the clarification, bigjohn. I know very well how you love to correct me.

Re: OT: politics
#54068 11/05/04 06:56 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
1) Those county by county maps are very misleading. The election is not decided by land mass, it's decided by population.

2) in reponse to:

"rather than looking to rein in the radical leftists in their party that dominate the headlines and provide easy targets for conservatives and moderates alike. Marxism, radical environmentalism, radical racial politics, atheism, increased taxation, etc... You expect normal people to vote for that?"

Umm...yeah, 48% of America did, nearly 56 million people. More people voted for Lefty Kerry than voted for Reagan in 1980.



Page 146 of 172 1 2 144 145 146 147 148 171 172

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,940
Posts442,457
Members15,616
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 145 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4