Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
M2/M3s vs. QS4/QS8s in surround
#82621 02/23/05 08:30 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 325
TNTguy Offline OP
devotee
OP Offline
devotee
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 325
Does anyone prefer the sound of the M2s/M3s over the QS series? I am still having to take a few shortcuts due to my budget and the QS4's are realistically out of reach. Just wondering if there are those who prefer the direct sound of the bookshelfs vs. the ambience of the QS series. I have heard a few mention that with the QS speakers in movies, sounds/effects can be difficult to place, which can be a positive or a negative depending on your point of view. I guess without listening to both as surrounds it is difficult for me to see if the QS series would be my preference.

Re: M2/M3s vs. QS4/QS8s in surround
#82622 02/23/05 01:47 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7
B
regular
Offline
regular
B
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7
Please see the "Is this a decent set-up" thread as this was touched upon briefly. I also have budget restraints and have similar decisions to make.

Re: M2/M3s vs. QS4/QS8s in surround
#82623 02/23/05 03:24 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
I just went from M2s to QS8s in the last couple of days. You definitely lose a bit of the "gee whiz" effect that comes from hearing all the surround effects coming from "there" or "there" (pointing to the surrounds) but IMO the overall effect of the QS surrounds is nicer.

If you're listening to a lot of music the M2s surrounds are great. The QSs seem just as good, just trying to say that for 5 channel music the difference between directs and quadpolars is much less.

Where are you located ? There's probably someone in the area with both...


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: M2/M3s vs. QS4/QS8s in surround
#82624 02/23/05 03:26 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745
Likes: 17
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745
Likes: 17
TNT, i put my personal thoughts into a post some time ago. They may be of interest to you.
You can find the ancient thread here.


"Those who preach the myths of audio are ignorant of truth."
Re: M2/M3s vs. QS4/QS8s in surround
#82625 02/23/05 08:02 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 325
TNTguy Offline OP
devotee
OP Offline
devotee
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 325
I am in Utah. I would love to audition them somewhere, but haven't noticed anyone from around here.

Re: M2/M3s vs. QS4/QS8s in surround
#82626 02/23/05 08:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8
regular
Offline
regular
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8
I went from direct surrounds to QS4s and at first I was a bit unimpressed becuase I was expecting a huge night/day difference. But after listening to them for a while, the fact that they aren't "in-your-face" is what makes them great! They are enveloping and immersive, making echoes, rain and effects more realistic.

I would recommend saving up for a bit more and then getting a set of QS rather than buying M2/3s now.


M22s - VP100 - QS4s - Dayton 12" Titanic MKIII
Re: M2/M3s vs. QS4/QS8s in surround
#82627 02/23/05 08:35 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 325
TNTguy Offline OP
devotee
OP Offline
devotee
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 325
Man....you guys are sucking the cash right out of me. You guys secretly in cohorts with the IRS?

Ok...I will go the QS4s route. Anywhere I could get some CHEAP speaker stands for them? I would love to buy the Axiom stands that were designed for them but I am so ridiculously overbudget now that I can't justify spending $160 on stands.

Re: M2/M3s vs. QS4/QS8s in surround
#82628 02/23/05 08:39 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
B
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
B
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
The QSS stands are actually pretty short for suggested surround height (but on the other hand, building stands that held the QS series up to a "normal" height would either have to be bulky or tippy). Instead of stands, could you use mounts? (there are T-straps included with the QSes and the Full Metal Bracket or something from racksandstands.com might do you as well).

Bren R.

Re: M2/M3s vs. QS4/QS8s in surround
#82629 02/23/05 10:38 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
Mounting on the wall is cheap and easy if you have walls in approximately the right place.

Remember that QS's are more tolerant of placement than direct speakers -- mine aren't even at the same height or orientation but they sound mighty fine. If I did that with direct speakers it would sound quite odd.


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: M2/M3s vs. QS4/QS8s in surround
#82630 02/24/05 06:31 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
B
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
B
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
In reply to:

mine aren't even at the same height or orientation



We're still talking about speakers here, right?

And why do I get this mental image of one lying on its back on the floor and another hanging by the speaker wire from the ceiling?

Bren R.


Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (BBIBH), 580 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4