Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
#97726 06/14/05 03:16 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 608
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 608
if money is not an issue,id say buy all the power you can...ron

Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
#97727 06/14/05 05:14 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 295
local
Offline
local
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 295
I just saw a NAD C352 Refurb for about $450.
80W x 2 Continuous Power (8 ohms)
115W, 185W, 240W Dynamic Power into 8, 4 and 2 ohms respectively.
Why would anyone recommend these over a couple of Outlaw M200 Monoblocks?

Excuse my stupidity...just trying to get an idea.

Thanks,


-------------------------------------
Denon 4308
M80x2,VP150,EP600,4xQS8
Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
#97728 06/15/05 07:56 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 164
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 164
I just found out the C352 doesn't have a phono input, so it looks like I'll be going with the C372. I didn't want to buy a phono pre so this will work out just fine. Can't wait to spin some vinyl.

Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
#97729 06/15/05 05:53 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 40
buff
Offline
buff
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 40
The c372 doesn't have it either , just thought i'd let ya know.

Cheers

Al

Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
#97730 06/16/05 04:38 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 16
M
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
M
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 16
Because they have more current. Over 100 amps.

Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
#97731 06/19/05 10:52 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 164
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 164
I brought home the C352 (and NAD PP2 phono pre) and I'm very pleased with the results. I now have more gain thanks to the phono pre and I can also spin vinyl at louder volumes without having the music break-up and distort. The overall sound of my Rega P3, Grado Sonata and the NAD is really wonderful.

Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
#97732 06/19/05 05:38 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 86
T
old hand
Offline
old hand
T
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 86
I knew you would like the 352. As I said before, the 372 would have been a waste of your money unless you like insanely loud music or have a barn to fill. Again, I love my NAD with the 60's.

Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
#97733 06/21/05 05:20 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 164
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 164
Todd, I have a question. When going from my receiver (pre-out) to my integrated I am still able to use the volume control on my receiver. Shouldn't the volume be by-passed? I though I would be using only the amp in the integrated.

Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
#97734 06/21/05 08:24 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
No, DT, volume control takes place at the preamp/processor stage, so it's already taken effect when the signal leaves the pre-outs on your receiver.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
#97735 06/21/05 01:22 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 164
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 164
John, I want to run my 2 channel music through the NAD, should I run it directly into the integrated amp as opposed to the receiver?

Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,940
Posts442,457
Members15,616
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 558 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4