DTS Vs. DD
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 35
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 35 |
What is the difference between DTS and Dolby Digital?
Does my DVD player need to be compatible for DTS. I do not know if mine is.
Is the sound quality that much better between DTS and DD?
I have 2 QS8s, 2 M60s, 1 VP150 and 1 EP(Kicks A*s)500.
Do I need a single speaker for the back for DTS?
Thanks
|
|
|
Re: DTS Vs. DD
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424 |
In reply to:
What is the difference between DTS and Dolby Digital?
http://www.audioholics.com/techtips/specsformats/dolbydigitaldts.php
In reply to:
Does my DVD player need to be compatible for DTS
Yes it does. If it is, the DTS logo will be on it somewhere.
In reply to:
Do I need a single speaker for the back for DTS?
No. DTS is 5.1 just like Dolby Digital.
|
|
|
Re: DTS Vs. DD
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7 |
There are also 6.1 versions of both DD and DTS. One is called ES, the other is called EX, and I can never remember which is which.
Anyways, there were two competing standards (DD and DTS); DD got chosen to be the DVD standard format but lots of people say DTS is technically superior. Other people say the DTS soundtracks are just recorded a bit hotter to make them sound better than the DD soundtrack.
All DVDs have a DD soundtrack, many also have DTS. I think we tend to pick the DTS soundtrack given a choice, but that might just to show that we know *how* to pick the DTS soundtrack
M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39 M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1 LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
|
|
|
Re: DTS Vs. DD
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
DTS ES (stands for Extended Surround)
DD EX
|
|
|
Re: DTS Vs. DD
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,703
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,703 |
I thought the specs on DTS had a wider response (freq range) on all channels.
|
|
|
Re: DTS Vs. DD
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,189
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,189 |
The encoded bitrate for DTS is higher than DD, I can't recall the exact numbers but something like 768 kbps vs. 384/400 (something?) for DD.
|
|
|
Re: DTS Vs. DD
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,422
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,422 |
I heard that DD **AND** DTS are BOTH standard on the new Blu-ray and HD-DVD standards, so it just goes to show the popularity of DTS.
I have been using DTS sound in my home theater (my current one and the one in my old house I used to live at) since some time like 1998. I was an outcast by people that didn't know what DTS was back then, but I sure liked it. Now it is so commonplace, I don't know why someone wouldn't get it, and any reasonable audio/video component should have it by default any more these days.
Farewell - June 4, 2020
|
|
|
Re: DTS Vs. DD
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
Both formats have sampling rates of 48kHz (48,000 samples per second).
The DTS encoding rate is 768 kb/s (not sure if its variable).
DD encoding rate is variable up to 448kb/s. I've seen it as low as 192 kb/s.
|
|
|
Re: DTS Vs. DD
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 164
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 164 |
Not sure but I could have swore that the Audioholics site had different numbers Peter.
-----
DD compresses a 5.1 channel surround track to 384 kbps to 448 kbps (DVD Standard limited, DD has the potential of up to 640 kbps) while DTS uses much higher bit rates up to 1.4 Mbps for CD's / LD's and 1.5 Mbps for DVD
-----
Do bit-rates == encoding or are we talking about different measures?
|
|
|
Re: DTS Vs. DD
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,501
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,501 |
I have also been told by a movie industry worker that the theatrical versions of DTS and DD are slightly more compressed than the DVD releases.....although the differences are probably inaudible.
|
|
|
Re: DTS Vs. DD
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
Isn't it hard to find DVD's in DTS formats, it was my understanding and experience that DD is the Norm, at least in the U.S.?
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: DTS Vs. DD
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,339
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,339 |
It take more room for DTS on dvd. That's why DTS discs don't always have all the extra features. Usually I have to search online for DTS versions.
|
|
|
Re: DTS Vs. DD
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,189
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,189 |
Yes, most DVD's are just DD/EX even though many of the films are DTS in the theater. It's more marketable for them to put in extras you can watch on the DVD than to allocate the space for the DTS soundtrack. Kind of a shame in my opinion. At least some DVD (like LOTR) are offered in DTS versions for those who want it.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,944
Posts442,472
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
359
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|