|
|
 Matching L/C/R
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,021 Likes: 1
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,021 Likes: 1 |
It's a non issue right now but I will have a tower as a center eventually.
Matching speakers up front was the goal but now I can't help wonder if the M100 wouldn't be the way to go.
|
|
|
Re: Matching L/C/R
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488 |
Well, in order to take full advantage of the sonic advantages incurred by the extra cost, you'd probably have to place it ENTIRELY behind an acoustically-transparent screen OR have your screen above it, which would make the viewing pretty darn uncomfortable. How much overkill is enough?
bibere usque ad hilaritatem
|
|
|
Re: Matching L/C/R
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,021 Likes: 1
connoisseur
|
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,021 Likes: 1 |
The AT screen will be here before the tower.
Its not about overkill.
Running phantom center now and it actually works pretty good, better than the center I was using.
Thinking the deeper bass would be worthwhile.
|
|
|
Re: Matching L/C/R
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,021 Likes: 1
connoisseur
|
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,021 Likes: 1 |
"take full advantage of the sonic advantages"
Thats why I'm torn between them.
The M80 will be a substantial improvement but one would assume the difference between the two would be noteworthy and deffinetly worth considering.
|
|
|
Re: Matching L/C/R
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,021 Likes: 1
connoisseur
|
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,021 Likes: 1 |
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
1 members (rrlev),
740
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
