Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
M60s w/no sub vs. W22s & EP500
#156143 01/18/07 04:58 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6
G
regular
OP Offline
regular
G
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6
Due to room layout restrictions, it’s difficult for me to have floorstanding mains (or bookshelves on stands) and a subwoofer at the same time. So, I find myself contrasting two systems: a pair of M60s with no sub vs. a pair of wall mounted W22s (mounted on either side of a wall-mounted plasma) with an EP500. In either case, I will be using a VP150 and a pair QS8s to complete my 5.1 system. Receiver is a middle-of-the-road Yamaha.

Now, I know the answer is obvious for movies – get the W22s with the EP500. However, I care much more about 2 channel music than I do about movie sound, which is why I’m attracted to the M60s. I really want superb sound for my music, and will likely upgrade the electronics over the long term, so I view the speakers as an investment – I like to buy things I think I will keep for a while.

So, my question is, strictly from a music standpoint, will the M60s deliver better SQ than the W22/EP500 combo? I’m not a bass-addict, a point proved by the fact that I’ve been listening to the same pair of TDL bookshelves for the past 15 years. I’d rather have an impeccable mid-range and high end, even if it means giving up some deep bass. Is this the basic tradeoff I’m facing between these two systems?

BYW, the room is 14x16x9, with one wall opening up into a kitchen and/or a vaulted entry way.

TIA,
George

Re: M60s w/no sub vs. W22s & EP500
GeorgeHudetz #156144 01/18/07 05:49 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
That is, indeed, the basic trade-off you're making. The M22s and the M60s do have similar sound in the ranges they both produce. Naturally, the M60s go lower and can throw a bigger "image" at you. The M22s paired with an EP500 is a thing to behold, however. I just added an EP500 to my M22s recently, and I can tell you -- even if you're not a bass head, you will definitely realize a great improvement in your music. Bass can be subtle, and it can blow you away.

Your room is not too big, so the M22 + EP500 combo could fill it with very loud music (if you chose to).

Re: M60s w/no sub vs. W22s & EP500
GeorgeHudetz #156145 01/18/07 02:29 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 24
B
hobbyist
Offline
hobbyist
B
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 24
Take my response with a grain of salt... I have not heard either M22s or M60s, or an EP500... but I'm ordering M60s plus and EP500 shortly (not to rub that in).

It sounds like you've already got a pretty solid grasp on the tradeoffs of either setup, and your personal preference for music perhaps goes a long way...

Everything I've read leads me to believe you would not be disappointed with the musical setup of the M22s + EP500. In fact, from everything I've read, it would be a great musical setup. Again, I'm only speaking after reading reviews, but the only knock on the M22s is that they lack bass... the EP500 clearly takes care of that.

Whether the M60s will help with "soundstage" or "depth"... I can't say. All I know is that it doesn't sound like you'd be disappointed with M22s and an EP500.

One factor that would tip it for me... the M22s and M60s are supposed to be "great" products. I've read a few reviews to make me believe the EP500 is an "astonishing" product. I'd go with the M22s + EP500, as you'd be getting your hands on what seems to be one of Axiom's most impressive products, the EP500.

However, if you go toward the M60s... Any chance you can fit a smaller sub in with the M60s? SVS' new "small" sub (SB12+) is intriguing... and I've read some great reviews on an even smaller, cheaper sub... the Onix Rocket ULW10 (12"x12"!, available for $400... see the review on Audioholics). Though certainly not an EP500, those subs could provide solid bass for HT.

Looking at non-outlet prices...
M22s + EP500 = $1660?
M60s = $960
M60s + SVS SB12-plus = 1660 (plus SVS shipping)
M60s + Onix ULW10 = 1360 (plus Onix shipping)

Anyway, my preference would be for a subwoofer. I don't think you'd be disappointed with the M22s + EP500.

Re: M60s w/no sub vs. W22s & EP500
GeorgeHudetz #156146 01/18/07 02:34 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 24
B
hobbyist
Offline
hobbyist
B
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 24
Ooh... and another thing I just noticed. I've read that wall mounting M22s supposedly doesn't diminish the sound at all (and in fact may improve bass response?)... and if you have a wall mounted plasma, wall mounted m22s, and also wall mount the VP150, that would be a pretty cool setup.

Re: M60s w/no sub vs. W22s & EP500
GeorgeHudetz #156147 01/18/07 02:53 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102
Any specific reason you want to go with the W22s instead of wall mounted M22s?


Producer | Composer
www.robbhutzal.com
Re: M60s w/no sub vs. W22s & EP500
Hutzal #156148 01/18/07 03:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6
G
regular
OP Offline
regular
G
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6
Quote:

Any specific reason you want to go with the W22s instead of wall mounted M22s?




Partially for the form factor, and partially for the bottom-firing ports. However, I too have read the thread about wall mounted M22s. It sounds appealing, but I'm concerned that the added bass due to the close mounting is somewhat room dependent. It may work for me, and it may not. Although I suppose that's what the return policy is for. So I'm not ruling it out.

And, thanks for the other replies as well. I'll check into some of the smaller subs. I'm still hoping to hear from somebody who has heard both setups, however.

Re: M60s w/no sub vs. W22s & EP500
GeorgeHudetz #156149 01/18/07 03:39 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 24
B
hobbyist
Offline
hobbyist
B
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 24
Gah. I only just noticed that you said W22s, not M22s. Sorry about blabbering on about M22s.

Re: M60s w/no sub vs. W22s & EP500
baglorious #156150 01/18/07 06:52 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 552
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 552
M60s and a sub!! I know I know, I read your post, you can't have both.

M60s go low enough in stereo but adding a sub go even lower and "fuller". My sub is relatively small but very "musical"


Axiom M60s, QS4s, VP100 Onkyo TX-SR804 Oppo 970HD Rotel RB-1080/RCD-1072 REL Q150E sub, PS 3
Re: M60s w/no sub vs. W22s & EP500
thyname #156151 01/18/07 10:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6
G
regular
OP Offline
regular
G
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6
Quote:

M60s and a sub!! I know I know, I read your post, you can't have both.

M60s go low enough in stereo but adding a sub go even lower and "fuller". My sub is relatively small but very "musical"




Yeah, that's what I really want. But it's hard to get there for the time being. Perhaps I'll just get the M60s for now and wait for a good opportunity to sneak the sub in, like getting new furniture and/or a new house.

Re: M60s w/no sub vs. W22s & EP500
GeorgeHudetz #156152 01/18/07 10:04 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,102
do you jsut not have the floor space for a sub?

Like others have posted, the SVS SB12 or an SVS Cylinder sub have a very small foot print.


Producer | Composer
www.robbhutzal.com
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 694 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4