My cousin linked to this earlier today. She scored an 8, where as I got a 0 (lower scores are better, 0 being perfect). Women usually score better than men.
http://www.xrite.com/custom_page.aspx?PageID=77&Lang=enSo are you wasting money on that high end display?
I got a 42. Not too good eh?
Scored a 0, perfect color acuity
.
15. Thought I was doing a lot better than that.
What does this test tell you if you can only deal with it for about 20 secs before you are bored and quit?
I got 0, too. (
screencap)
My process was to sort the most obvious to the left and right, not worrying much about order. Then I sorted each third separately. Toward the end of each row sort, it was fairly easy for me to see when two swatches were swapped.
The question should be do you have a color vision deficiency?
I do and so do about 5% of the male population compared to less than 1% of the female population.
Or whether your monitor isn't particularly well calibrated. Or good, for that matter.
I worked from right to left.
I thought about that too. I'm using a professional, calibrated (using X-Rite gear, coincidentally) monitor that I use for photo processing. Cheap monitors could very well have inversions with neighboring hues.
I'm using my MacBook Pro's screen with its default color profile. Very low ambient light. I'm in bed.
(Can't sleep)
well, that blows my theory.
What color clothes are you wearing?
I used a Dell 1558 laptop.
16 the first time, 4 the next. It helped me to block out the other rows and only look at one at a time. Both tests I was off in the teal area.
I worked for decades in photolabs, and i sure don't want to try this test and risk failing it;
the only thing i will say about it is that it has happened often that, walking on the street, i often see people smile at me in a benign way or even turn their back on me and bend in two for no apparent reason.
aside from photolab tech., my hobby was photography (now flexing the muscles on my M80's);
you can have a look here:http://gellidius.deviantart.com/gallery/
Just click on the thumbnails and also on the images thereafter.
Sorry, kiddies. Color perception doesn't really work like that.
Read: Ogden Rood, Rudolph Arnheim, or Josef Albers.
They are the Gods of Color Theory.
Evaluating your perecetpion from an internet test is like determining your sexuality from a Cosmo survey. It's a parlor game.
The Pope has spoken.
Gods of Colour?
All hail the Crimson King!!!
*throws entire collection of Cosmo in the trash*
Gee, thanks Bob.
I can say for certain that it doesn't matter what your screen is calibrated to, as long as it is reasonably close and you have color deficient sight, you won't do well.
I have been diagnosed with Deutan colorblindness using the Farnsworth test. Here is a quick Farnsworth test online
http://www.colblindor.com/color-arrangement-test/
I redid the test with reading glasses and brightened up my monitor....got a 4 this time.
I thought that was very interesting, Chris. While I was reluctant to spend the requisite time on it, I got an 8. I'm using a dusty, $100 monitor in a brightly lit room. I'm honestly surprised I did that well.
I got a 4... What I wonder though is whether it would work better on a CRT than my LCD screen. Ever notice how colors shift a little or aren't as vibrant on an LCD? Either way, that is my excuse. :-P
I'm also with Lamp.
Life is too short. . .
Alan
I got a 15 on a HP laptop....no bad I think
Got a 30. Like Ken, I thought it was going better than that.
30?? shakes head....JP, I thought with all those pretty coloured pills you prescribe, you could have aced this test with one eye tied behind your back.
Viagra does cause temporary blue/green confusion. I'm just saying...
36. I thought I was doing pretty well but did not want to spend any more time on it. I'll try it again when I am not working.