8973 Members
11 Forums
22143 Topics
391616 Posts
Max Online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
|
|
|
#110650 - 09/14/05 01:41 PM
Shopping for a consumer DV camera
|
shareholder in the making
Registered: 04/02/03
Posts: 16015
Loc: Leesburg, Virginia
|
My grandma and parents want to buy us a digital video camera so that when we move to Virginia we can keep them updated with videos of the kids and such. Being an Axiom owner, I'm in the bang-for-the-buck category of gadget shoppers, but I'm not sure where to start looking.
I know that I want about a good optical zoom, image stabilization, recording to tape (not CD/DVD), FireWire output, better than decent still image capability (captured to flash or SD card), and that I don't need any in-camera effects/titling/faders since I can do all that on a computer. I also know that the 3 CCD cameras take better looking video, but are likely out of the target price range.
That being said, are there any brands I should gravitate towards or avoid?
_________________________
-- Let me tell you a story about why I believe anecdotal evidence. --
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#110651 - 09/14/05 01:43 PM
Re: Shopping for a consumer DV camera
|
veteran
Registered: 04/20/05
Posts: 170
Loc: New Jersey
|
I have a JVC and I am more than happy with it. Definately cheaper than the Sonys, so it is definately a bank-for-the-buck product in my opinion.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#110652 - 09/14/05 01:46 PM
Re: Shopping for a consumer DV camera
|
shareholder in the making
Registered: 09/27/04
Posts: 10250
Loc: 543 miles North of VAST
|
I have a tendency to gravitate towards Sony and Canon, but I'm really not familiar with the consumer-level units to make any specific recommendations. Sorry!
_________________________
::::::: “Yum. I'd love to gnaw on those with my ears." :::::::
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#110653 - 09/14/05 02:12 PM
Re: Shopping for a consumer DV camera
|
shareholder in the making
Registered: 04/02/03
Posts: 16015
Loc: Leesburg, Virginia
|
I just look at a few review sites and I really like the Canon Elura 90. Not sure how about the price, though ( under $500 after a $50 rebate). Perhaps I should ask them what the budget is -- it'd make looking easier.
_________________________
-- Let me tell you a story about why I believe anecdotal evidence. --
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#110655 - 09/14/05 04:25 PM
Re: Shopping for a consumer DV camera
|
shareholder in the making
Registered: 04/02/03
Posts: 16015
Loc: Leesburg, Virginia
|
Thanks for the offer! I'll have to look at what Sony has available.
_________________________
-- Let me tell you a story about why I believe anecdotal evidence. --
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#110656 - 09/15/05 04:19 PM
Re: Shopping for a consumer DV camera
|
connoisseur
Registered: 07/23/04
Posts: 3739
Loc: Up yonder
|
I like Cannon. I think they are the best on the market for the price. Sony has what some folks consider a better lens (Zies), but the Cannon’s have a better image stabilization. The Cannons use a “floating” optic vrs digital.
Two years ago I bought the Optura 200 MC and love it. If I were to buy a dig cam today, I’d give the Optura 500 a serious look. It’s one step down from the 600 and about half the cost. You can find the 500 for about $600. It’s got a 10X optical zoom and a 4 meg still picture pixel rate. My 200 has a 1.3 meg pixel rate for stills.
Some points to consider with these little buggers. 1) comfort 2) zoom 3) still shots 4) battery life 5) size 6) the screen illumination
You should really hold a few. I prefer the palm cameras like the one I have. Keep in mind that you will usually use the screen while shooting, but sometimes, you will have to use the view finder due to ambient light.
Get at least 10X optical zoom.
It’s pretty darn handy to have the ability to take stills so you aren’t packing around the dig camcorder and another camera. Make sure the camera has a separate memory stick for stills. Saving them to the tape sucks.
These things suck down batteries pretty quick. And they recharge slowly…..this is a biggie to consider.
Too small is sometimes just too damn small. Again, hold a few to see what’s comfortable for you to hold. Light is good, but too light makes them wiggly in your hand.
There is a big difference with screens. Some don’t work worth a crap in the daylight. My Cannon works remarkable well.
_________________________
"......The wisdom of life consists in the elimination of nonessentials." ~ Lin Yutang
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#110657 - 09/15/05 06:15 PM
Re: Shopping for a consumer DV camera
|
shareholder in the making
Registered: 04/02/03
Posts: 16015
Loc: Leesburg, Virginia
|
Thanks for the tips. I think I'll drop into a Best Buy and hold a bunch of different cameras. I have big hands, so I'm not sure if the more compact Opturas will be to my liking.
_________________________
-- Let me tell you a story about why I believe anecdotal evidence. --
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#110658 - 09/16/05 12:59 AM
Re: Shopping for a consumer DV camera
|
connoisseur
Registered: 12/10/03
Posts: 3602
Loc: Winnipeg MB Canada
|
I'd steer you towards Sony, Panasonic used to have some good consumer cameras, maybe still do?... Canon's got a great PR wagon, but even their prosumer cameras suffer from some giant flaws (green shift anyone?) and their full pro lenses ($30,000 12x ENG lenses up to $100,000 55x box lenses) and considered "base equipment" (with Fujinon lenses being prefered by shooters)
Bren R.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#110659 - 10/03/05 02:22 AM
Re: Shopping for a consumer DV camera
|
shareholder in the making
Registered: 04/02/03
Posts: 16015
Loc: Leesburg, Virginia
|
It has come down to two cameras:
Canon Optura 40
Panasonic PV-GS150
The major difference between these two is that the Panny uses 3 CCDs (one for each primary color) instead of just one. This theoretically result in better video quality, but the single CCD Canon's video quality compares really well to it. I can get both of these cameras for right around $500, although the Optura would be a refurb at that price.
I cannot decide which one to get. Any opinions would be greatly appreciated.
_________________________
-- Let me tell you a story about why I believe anecdotal evidence. --
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|