8964 Members
11 Forums
22106 Topics
390702 Posts
Max Online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
|
|
|
#142479 - 07/09/06 04:15 PM
Re: Acoustic Panels
[Re: RickF]
|
axiomite
Registered: 08/25/04
Posts: 5256
Loc: Bowmanville, Ontario, Canada
|
D'oh !! Um... (thinks for a minute) well, duh, obviously I meant invite them in the winter when it's bitterly cold in both places and Florida doesn't seem so far away. Yeah, that's what I meant !!  It's not too bad, really, although it is kind of mind-numbing (although not as bad as archaeology). You can download a series of test tones from RealTraps and burn them onto a CD so that hitting "next" moves to the next frequency. Then you just set up the SPL meter on a tripod in a reasonably readable position, step through the frequencies on the CD, and record the SPL meter reading at each step being careful to stand in exactly the same place every time so as not to muck up the readings. It's easier if you have a "reader" and a "writer-downer". Here are the instructions from the Rives CD : http://www.rivesaudio.com/files/TestCDinst.pdfThe other option, also from Rives I think, is a little kit you hook up to a PC your HT aux inputs. You push a key, it makes some wierd noises, digests the results for a minute, then spews out not only frequency response charts but spectral decay graphs for all the frequencies, eg "the room is too absorbent at most frequencies but has an evil echo at 500 Hz". http://www.rivesaudio.com/software/testkit.htmlFor the HT owner who has everything -- including crappy acoustics 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#142480 - 07/09/06 06:17 PM
Re: Acoustic Panels
[Re: RickF]
|
shareholder in the making
Registered: 01/29/04
Posts: 13147
Loc: Iowa
|
Rick, that is great, I'm trying to decide what to do...the tri-traps are more expensive, but seem to have much better absorption compared to traps that span corners. Everything is better than foam, based on my recent studies. If the trap is made from rigid fiberglass like owens corning 703, or using mineral wool board (cheaper) your good to go. The 440 and 442 (1st/2nd reflections) are much much cheaper.
I've learned tons from the Realtraps website. The videos showing how nulls can exist within 1" is amazing. Ethan's HT room is killer with 39 traps. I've also learned that what people say about HT being differant than music for treatments is not true, the main goal is to achieve a flat as possible frequency curve. Reducing ringing, combing is also very important. You can't do that with just furniture, drapes, etc...
I'm also tossing around the idea of building my own. It might be cheaper than building them. Insulationworld.com has good prices on Owens Corning Mineral Wool board.
_________________________
M80s-VP180-QS8s-EP600-2xEP350 Denon3808 Outlaw7700 M22-OWM22-VP100-Denon2805 Audio Nirvana
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#142481 - 07/10/06 02:31 PM
Re: Acoustic Panels
[Re: PorterPlex]
|
veteran
Registered: 04/20/05
Posts: 170
Loc: New Jersey
|
Quote:
Ethan's HT room is killer with 39 traps.
I did some before and after room graphs and posted them on the AVS board. I was luck enough to get a response from Ethan and he suggested that a room my size should optimumly have 16 traps!!! 
If anyone is interested, I can post my befores and afters for my room. Sirquack is getting some good analysis and I would not mind more advice as well.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#142485 - 07/13/06 11:04 PM
Re: Acoustic Panels
[Re: bridgman]
|
shareholder in the making
Registered: 01/29/04
Posts: 13147
Loc: Iowa
|
Very well put John, I'm sure you have read this article by Ethan from RealTraps, but I'll post it for the others, basically an Acoustic Treatment 101. Yes everyone, acoustic treatments are not just for music/recording studios, the same rules apply to a HT environment. http://www.ethanwiner.com/acoustics.html
_________________________
M80s-VP180-QS8s-EP600-2xEP350 Denon3808 Outlaw7700 M22-OWM22-VP100-Denon2805 Audio Nirvana
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|