Get Free, Friendly, Expert Advice
Call 1-866-244-8796 or email

Designed and Manufactured in Canada Since 1980


AxiomAudio Blog

Blind Listening Tests

Sneak Peek into Axiom’s Current Research and Development

Axiom’s Newest Speaker: The In-Ceiling M3

Wall'O'Fame
Experimental Atmos
Greetings fellow Axiom owners...
Who's Online
1 registered (Murph), 51 Guests and 7 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Financing
Forum Stats
13329 Members
11 Forums
22920 Topics
405209 Posts

Max Online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
Top Posters
Ken.C 17789
pmbuko 16289
SirQuack 13340
CV 11236
MarkSJohnson 10941
Meanwhile On Facebook

Did you get your "Golden Email"? The great gift certificate email giveaway star...

Here's a helpful article for everyone looking at putting a new stereo or home th...

Interesting article about who's getting the money from streaming radio services...

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#158814 - 02/15/07 06:40 PM Receiver Question
Prisoner655321 Offline
frequent flier

Registered: 10/19/06
Posts: 16
I have a pretty cheap Sony Receiver I purchased a couple of years ago running with my current axiom setup. In the areas I care most about sound (HD-DVD and DVD audio)I am running the sound via the multi channel analog cables.

Does my receiver have any bearing on the sound or does it just pass it thorugh? I have been considering upgrading my receiver this summer with the Sherwood HDMI 1.3 receiver, but will it have any effect on the sound quality I have currently if it doesn't process the sound? Would I be better off getting a HDMI 1.1 receiver that can carry the HD audio signal that my HD-DVD player decodes?

I'm looking for any ideas, because if getting an upgraded receiver wouldn't have much of an affect I can put tat money towards teh new sub that I need and the new TV that I want.

Any input would be appreciated.

Top
#158815 - 02/15/07 08:15 PM Re: Receiver Question [Re: Prisoner655321]
mjwilli Offline
hobbyist

Registered: 06/18/04
Posts: 28
Loc: Florida, USA
I think it's a combination of both. Speakers are a major factor but the receiver does make a difference. I used to have a Sony and it was fine, but I did notice a difference when I upgraded to an Integra. I purchased the Axioms first. So I did notice a difference when I replaced my speakers and again when I replaced the receiver. Is it worth the extra money? It was for me, but I watch a lot of movies and listen to music during the day.
_________________________
Mjwilli

Top
#158816 - 02/15/07 09:43 PM Re: Receiver Question [Re: Prisoner655321]
JohnK Offline
shareholder in the making

Registered: 05/11/02
Posts: 10405
Priz, except of course for amplifying the sound, a well-designed receiver/amplifier is supposed to pass it through without adding any sonic characteristic of its own. Flat 20-20KHz response and inaudibly low noise and distortion are the requirements, and many moderate-cost units, possibly including your Sony, can meet those requirements. If so, it's already amplifying transparently and there won't be any sound difference when you don't apply tone controls or other sound processing features.
_________________________
-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.



Top
#158817 - 02/15/07 09:52 PM Re: Receiver Question [Re: Prisoner655321]
jakewash Offline
shareholder in the making

Registered: 12/26/03
Posts: 10399
Loc: Calgary, Alberta
Chances are the extra power you will get from the upgrade will make it a noticeable difference. The lower end Sony's are notorious for over rating the WPC spec.
_________________________
Jason
-----------------
TTTHHHPPPPPTTTT!

My HT

Top
#158818 - 02/15/07 10:16 PM Re: Receiver Question [Re: jakewash]
Prisoner655321 Offline
frequent flier

Registered: 10/19/06
Posts: 16
That's true. I'm pretty sure I'm not getting a full "120 Watts per Channel" like it claims.

But, I'm more wondering if the receiver does any processing when passing through the analog multi channel input. Is my DVD player doing everything. Because if tha were the case, changing receivers wouldn't change all taht much, correct?

Top
#158819 - 02/15/07 10:35 PM Re: Receiver Question [Re: Prisoner655321]
jakewash Offline
shareholder in the making

Registered: 12/26/03
Posts: 10399
Loc: Calgary, Alberta
I noticed quite a difference going from a low end sony to my 1804 Denon and then from a sony DVD player to a Samsung. The Denon had a little more clarity at lower volumes. The Samsung seems to have more output to the receiver than the Sony did. I was listening to movies at -15 to -10 with the Sony and now listen at -20 to -15. So there is a difference in the electronics and signals that they send.
_________________________
Jason
-----------------
TTTHHHPPPPPTTTT!

My HT

Top
#158820 - 02/15/07 10:37 PM Re: Receiver Question [Re: Prisoner655321]
JohnK Offline
shareholder in the making

Registered: 05/11/02
Posts: 10405
Priz, if you have evidence of that, file a formal complaint with the FTC, because it would be a violation of the regulations. All receiver/amplifiers sold in the U.S. have to meet the power rating resulting from the test method in the FTC regs.

The player does the digital-analog conversion when feeding the analog inputs of the receiver. The user can of course apply tone controls or other processing of his choice.
_________________________
-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.



Top
#158821 - 02/16/07 03:55 AM Re: Receiver Question [Re: JohnK]
jakewash Offline
shareholder in the making

Registered: 12/26/03
Posts: 10399
Loc: Calgary, Alberta
Quote:

Priz, if you have evidence of that, file a formal complaint with the FTC, because it would be a violation of the regulations. All receiver/amplifiers sold in the U.S. have to meet the power rating resulting from the test method in the FTC regs.





You may be getting the specified wattage but only at peak times and not on all channels like you get with H/K, Yamaha, Denon etc. I seem to remember a post/article somewhere with receiver wattages listed and all channels driven and Sony's(low end receiver) came up very short, as well as a few others, but the more pricey receivers(Onkyo, H/K, Denon, upper end Sony, etc) were very close to their ratings or surpassed them. But this was from a few years ago when I was looking for my equipment.


Edited by jakewash (02/16/07 03:57 AM)
_________________________
Jason
-----------------
TTTHHHPPPPPTTTT!

My HT

Top
#158822 - 02/16/07 08:48 AM Re: Receiver Question [Re: jakewash]
Wid Offline
axiomite

Registered: 06/22/03
Posts: 6722
Loc: The Peoples Republic of Il.
_________________________
Rick


"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud


Top
#158823 - 02/16/07 09:25 AM Re: Receiver Question [Re: Wid]
SirQuack Offline
shareholder in the making

Registered: 01/29/04
Posts: 13340
Loc: Iowa
Thanks Wid for that link, I'm curious if there is an updated report anywhere, many receivers are not listed. I guess I get the idea of which brands are conservative rated.
_________________________
M80s-VP180-QS8s-EP600-2xEP350 Denon3808 Outlaw7700
M22-OWM22-VP100-Denon2805
Audio Nirvana

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >



Moderator:  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Home  |  Corporate Info  |  Products  |  Message Board  |  FAQs  |  Warranty  |  Site Map  |  Privacy Statement   |  Contact Us

©2014 Colquhoun Audio Laboratories Limited
All Rights Reserved.