Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
42
#209670 05/28/08 01:22 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
pmbuko Offline OP
shareholder in the making
OP Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
I learned a new reason why the number 42 is so cool today.

Imagine a straight tunnel directly through the center of the Earth. Now imagine an unpowered vehicle attached to rails in this tunnel. You get in this vehicle and to start your journey you release the clamps and begin to fall by the power of gravity alone. As you fall toward the Earth's core, you accelerate. Then as you pass the Earth's core, you start to decelerate. It works out (if you ignore wind resistance) that when you reach the surface of the Earth on the other side of the tunnel, you will come to a stop (and engage the clamps to prevent falling back in).

How long would that complete journey take? 42 minutes.

Now imagine a straight tunnel from Los Angeles to New York. This tunnel would cut through the mantle at a shallow angle. A journey through this tunnel would also take 42 minutes in a vehicle powered by gravity alone.

It turns out that a tunnel between any two points on the globe would take 42 minutes to traverse.

So, yeah. 42 (youtube video about this phenomenon)

Re: 42
pmbuko #209671 05/28/08 01:32 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
The only problem with that technique is that it would also take 42 minutes between you and the coffee machine! \:\)


See Mojo's signature
Re: 42
EFalardeau #209673 05/28/08 01:40 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
pmbuko Offline OP
shareholder in the making
OP Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
Naturally. It would also be a pain in the butt for people to have to jump over the groove in the floor on their way to the copier.

Re: 42
pmbuko #209680 05/28/08 02:22 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,378
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,378
I didn't check the Youtube site, but I did a quick check using:

x=Xo+Vot+0.5at2 and it checks out IF "a" is constant.

However, "a" would not be constant as you approach the center of the Earth (it would decrease). Therefore, assuming no wind resistance, the travel time would be longer.


LFR1100 Actives,QS10HPx2,QS8x2,EP800,M3x4,M3x2 (Wood),M5HPx2 (Wood),AxiomAir,ADA1500-8,ADA1500-7
Re: 42
SRoode #209729 05/28/08 07:38 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
pmbuko Offline OP
shareholder in the making
OP Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
You're right that the acceleration is not uniform -- as you move closer to the center of the earth, acceleration decreases linearly. This is similar to harmonic oscillation, e.g. a mass hanging from a spring.

I just found a great paper/article backing up the 42-minute claim. (Click the PDF link.)

Turns out you can work the problem the same way by imagining a frictionless plane tangent to the earth's surface onto which you place a mass. Regardless of how far from the actual tangential point on the plane that you place the mass, it will take 42 minutes to make half an oscillation.

Sometimes I miss doing physics. \:\)

Re: 42
pmbuko #209737 05/28/08 07:54 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
Which, sadly, only makes 42 the answer for Earth, not everything.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: 42
Ken.C #209745 05/28/08 08:35 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
pmbuko Offline OP
shareholder in the making
OP Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
Sadly? We're the only planet that matters -- not that any aliens would know we think that.

Re: 42
pmbuko #209747 05/28/08 08:53 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
And here I always thought 42 was the answer to everything.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: 42
jakewash #209759 05/28/08 11:37 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210
42 ... that was eight years ago, sigh. \:\(

\:\)


Rick
Our Room

smile
Re: 42
RickF #209760 05/28/08 11:54 PM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,488
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,488
better yet, We could instal massive generators running off the earths core and have monsterously powerful magnetic motors that will shoot you through at the speed of light then when you get to the other side you stop. Really fast.

Hmm.. I guess 42 is pretty coo. By my calculations we could have something like that built in 42 years and 42 days and at the cost of only 42 trillion dollars. The total journey would only take you .042 seconds and you can only ride it 42 times before your face falls off from the extereme acceleration and deceleration.

\:\)

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,940
Posts442,457
Members15,616
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 386 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4