8973 Members
11 Forums
22143 Topics
391618 Posts
Max Online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
|
|
|
#219828 - 09/03/08 05:32 PM
Re: Receiver to make M60s sound good?
[Re: Ken.C]
|
shareholder in the making
Registered: 04/02/03
Posts: 16015
Loc: Leesburg, Virginia
|
which?
_________________________
-- Let me tell you a story about why I believe anecdotal evidence. --
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#219832 - 09/03/08 06:15 PM
Re: Receiver to make M60s sound good?
[Re: pmbuko]
|
shareholder in the making
Registered: 12/26/03
Posts: 10364
Loc: Calgary, Alberta
|
Which witch is which?
_________________________
Jason ----------------- TTTHHHPPPPPTTTT! My HT
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#219833 - 09/03/08 06:19 PM
Re: Receiver to make M60s sound good?
[Re: jakewash]
|
axiomite
Registered: 06/20/03
Posts: 7687
Loc: Tacoma
|
The one to burn, of course.
_________________________
We are a whole community of "that guy" - StPatGuy
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#219834 - 09/03/08 06:37 PM
Re: Receiver to make M60s sound good?
[Re: edmondwolfman]
|
axiomite
Registered: 12/06/07
Posts: 6755
Loc: Canada
|
I wonder whats going on in the room that causes audyssey to cut below 4kHz and boost above that?
_________________________
Fred
-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#219835 - 09/03/08 08:36 PM
Re: Receiver to make M60s sound good?
[Re: fredk]
|
shareholder in the making
Registered: 12/26/03
Posts: 10364
Loc: Calgary, Alberta
|
I know Audyssey doesn't read bass frequencies very well which is why it always sets the sub too low. But from 4k down to about 300 it should be good. I wonder if there are some reflections going on in the mid frequencies causing an increase in the readings, to which Audyssey then accomodates for.
_________________________
Jason ----------------- TTTHHHPPPPPTTTT! My HT
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#219856 - 09/04/08 12:59 AM
Re: Receiver to make M60s sound good?
[Re: fredk]
|
veteran
Registered: 06/17/08
Posts: 135
Loc: Edmond, OK
|
I wonder whats going on in the room that causes audyssey to cut below 4kHz and boost above that?
I'm not sure either. I did my Audyssey setup with 6 reference points if I remember correctly. Are the levels on other people's receivers more of a flat line or do they vary like mine? 
_________________________
"Real Gun Control Is Hitting What You Aim At" - can't remember
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#219857 - 09/04/08 01:56 AM
Re: Receiver to make M60s sound good?
[Re: edmondwolfman]
|
shareholder in the making
Registered: 05/11/02
Posts: 10022
|
Bobby, that rising frequency response isn't typical of the regular Audyssey correction. Are you sure that you didn't set the correction parameter to "flat"(which emphasizes the high frequencies more)rather than the normal "Audyssey" curve? A remote possibility would be a defective microphone reading the high frequencies too low and causing them to be boosted unnecessarily.
Also, as Ken suggested, don't use 5-channel stereo for normal music listening. The way to put the surrounds into action with 2-channel music material is to apply DPLII or similar ambience extraction processing.
_________________________
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#219868 - 09/04/08 10:39 AM
Re: Receiver to make M60s sound good?
[Re: JohnK]
|
veteran
Registered: 06/17/08
Posts: 135
Loc: Edmond, OK
|
Bobby, that rising frequency response isn't typical of the regular Audyssey correction. Are you sure that you didn't set the correction parameter to "flat"(which emphasizes the high frequencies more)rather than the normal "Audyssey" curve? A remote possibility would be a defective microphone reading the high frequencies too low and causing them to be boosted unnecessarily.
Also, as Ken suggested, don't use 5-channel stereo for normal music listening. The way to put the surrounds into action with 2-channel music material is to apply DPLII or similar ambience extraction processing. I didn't have it set to flat it was set to "Audyssey". Do you think that I should maybe balance out the levels and see what I get?
Edited by edmondwolfman (09/04/08 10:41 AM)
_________________________
"Real Gun Control Is Hitting What You Aim At" - can't remember
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#219873 - 09/04/08 11:23 AM
Re: Receiver to make M60s sound good?
[Re: edmondwolfman]
|
shareholder in the making
Registered: 12/26/03
Posts: 10364
Loc: Calgary, Alberta
|
I would try an all out equal across the board setting and go from there, if it sounds to bass heavy drop the lower 2 frequencies a couple, if it is still too bright, drop the upper two, etc.
_________________________
Jason ----------------- TTTHHHPPPPPTTTT! My HT
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#219875 - 09/04/08 11:26 AM
Re: Receiver to make M60s sound good?
[Re: jakewash]
|
veteran
Registered: 06/17/08
Posts: 135
Loc: Edmond, OK
|
I would try an all out equal across the board setting and go from there, if it sounds to bass heavy drop the lower 2 frequencies a couple, if it is still too bright, drop the upper two, etc. Do you mean set all to 0 or should I set the entire level a little higher?
_________________________
"Real Gun Control Is Hitting What You Aim At" - can't remember
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
Previous Topic
Index
