8962 Members
11 Forums
22096 Topics
390537 Posts
Max Online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
|
|
|
#390910 - 03/12/13 07:48 AM
Re: CatBrat
[Re: CatBrat]
|
axiomite
Registered: 08/05/09
Posts: 5391
Loc: Kansas City, Missouri
|
If you're going to get that Toyota and you're concerned about the snowability(new word?)of the tires, note that the original equipment Bridgestone D684 IIs don't look very impressive in the Tire Rack reviews here , especially in winter weather. Thanks John. I guess they'll get me through the summer until I can afford to replace them. Here's one person's comment on them that I found. "They suck off road. They are tires, so yeah they'll work, but if you get into anything, sand, mud, piles of dead chickens, you'll lose traction."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#390912 - 03/12/13 10:12 AM
Re: CatBrat
[Re: CatBrat]
|
axiomite
Registered: 10/05/06
Posts: 6160
Loc: PEI, Canada
|
Since you don't plan to leave the pavement too often, I wouldn't be too concerned about an all-terrain tire. They are definitely not a winter tire. They are not really even good off-road tires and they will not be of any benefit to you in the rest of the year. Thier only purpose, IMHO, is to make your truck look like a truck.
A good winter tire will stop on ice better by very surprising multiples and the difference in moderate snow is similarly dramatic. Some are designed more for ice and others more for clearing snow from the treads. You generally trade a bit one way for the other.
You are correct in that most winter tires are not designed for silly amounts of snow and despite advertisements of them tunneling through the alps, you won't hear any true verbal claims about being able to master real deep snow. However, they will still be an huge improvement over all-seasons or all-terrain.
Want to really play in the serious snow? You need an expensive off-road tire that won't self destruct or fly off your wheel when you purposely deflate them to 10-12 PSI or less. Because, seriously, that's what you need to float over the snow and/or spread your weight over enough tire surface that it gets really hard to get stuck. Even then, once you get high centered (the weight of your vehicle is sitting on the snow by it's belly instead of the tires) you're screwed. Clearance beats all but the worst tires, every time, in snow.
My last thought, The FJ is a pretty heavy rig. Keep in mind that whatever type of tires you invest in, they will need to be a light truck tire at minimum.
_________________________
I'm Riffing. People usually stop me when I'm riffing. Or carry on without me. That's also an option.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#390972 - 03/14/13 10:03 AM
Re: CatBrat
[Re: CatBrat]
|
axiomite
Registered: 10/05/06
Posts: 6160
Loc: PEI, Canada
|
1. MP3 as that is likely the only format your car deck supports. Many support iPads plugged into them as well but since you are talking an USB stick, it will be MP3 you most likely need.
When I burn any CD, I make a FLAC copy as well so I have a lossless versions for home listening but I also make an MP3 for my iPod and my car. I use 320 Kb/sec when I rip to MP3, just so I'm not subconsciously paranoid, but you could go smaller and still be good. Bigger number = less compression used but bigger file sizes so you fit less on your stick.
2. I use EAC as I have it all set up for automatically making MP3 and FLAC copies at the same time. However, I don't actually recommend it as it has a much steeper learning curve. I will let others chime in on much more convenient solutions.
3. Yes. Use folders to organize your artists and CDs. I start with a folder for an artist then have a sub-folder for each album. Some car decks simply use the folders for on-screen browsing.
Also, MP3, Flac, etc. all use a system called "Tags". When you rip the CD you will have an opportunity to fill in the artist, album name, track names, genre, etc. More complex car decks will use this tagging information to let you browse in an organized fashion. Either way, you should be good.
Also, most ripping programs have the ability to go out to sources on the Internet and automatically add all the tag information as soon as you pop the CD in the computer. You just have to be careful it actually picks out the correct album. I usually end up tweaking this information a just bit in order to keep my entire library consistent.
_________________________
I'm Riffing. People usually stop me when I'm riffing. Or carry on without me. That's also an option.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#390984 - 03/14/13 02:36 PM
Re: CatBrat
[Re: CatBrat]
|
axiomite
Registered: 08/05/09
Posts: 5391
Loc: Kansas City, Missouri
|
That you for the information!
I'm still planning on a Toyota FJ Cruiser with premium audio. Here's some information from their on-line owner's manual, page 267.
MP3 and WMA files:
MP3 (MPEG Audio LAYER3) is a standard audio compression format. Files can be compressed to approximately 1/10 of their original size by using MP3 compression. WMA (Windows Media Audio) is a Microsoft audio compression format. This format compresses audio data to a size smaller than that of the MP3 format. There is a limit to the MP3 and WMA file standards and to the media/formats recorded by them that can be used.
MP3 file compatibility:
• Compatible standards MP3 (MPEG1 LAYER3, MPEG2 LSF LAYER3) • Compatible sampling frequencies MPEG1 LAYER3: 32, 44.1, 48 (kHz) MPEG2 LSF LAYER3: 16, 22.05, 24 (kHz) • Compatible bit rates (compatible with VBR) MPEG1 LAYER3: 64, 80, 96, 112, 128, 160, 192, 224, 256, 320 (kbps) MPEG2 LSF LAYER3: 64, 80, 96, 112, 128, 144, 160 (kbps) • Compatible channel modes: stereo, joint stereo, dual channel and monaural
WMA file compatibility:
• Compatible standards WMA Ver. 7, 8, 9 • Compatible sampling frequencies 32, 44.1, 48 (kHz) • Compatible bit rates (only compatible with 2-channel playback) Ver. 7, 8: CBR 48, 64, 80, 96, 128, 160, 192 (kbps) Ver. 9: CBR 48, 64, 80, 96, 128, 160, 192, 256, 320 (kbps)
I guess I'll have to put some MP3 files in a folder withing a folder and see if it'll play properly on the audio system.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#391001 - 03/15/13 09:54 AM
Re: CatBrat
[Re: CatBrat]
|
axiomite
Registered: 10/05/06
Posts: 6160
Loc: PEI, Canada
|
Ha! I warned you that I did not recommend EAC. It works awesome once you have it set up but it's far, far from user friendly.
It will rip and it will encode at higher than 256 but you also need to download and install a copy of LAME, which is the MP3 compression engine.
Anyways, ignore EAC. As you have discovered, there are much easier methods.
_________________________
I'm Riffing. People usually stop me when I'm riffing. Or carry on without me. That's also an option.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|