|
2 registered (MarkSJohnson, Ken.C),
66
Guests and
5
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
8962 Members
11 Forums
22096 Topics
390546 Posts
Max Online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
|
|
|
#383370 - 09/26/12 10:11 PM
Re: Trade-ups revisited
[Re: Ian]
|
axiomite
Registered: 05/11/02
Posts: 9975
|
Ian, I've just been playing with those numbers a bit and they look good as far as I've gone. One thought on the "higher model"(or same for V2)requirement. If the primary characteristic of a "trade-up" is purchasing a higher cost model, could this be phrased as cost in relation to trade-in value, rather than than in relation to model numbers(say, the new model must cost at least 20% more than the trade-in value). For example, an older M50 or M60 with a trade-in value around $200-$300 could be traded-in on new M22s or a new VP160.
_________________________
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#383381 - 09/27/12 07:13 AM
Re: Trade-ups revisited
[Re: JohnK]
|
President
aficionado
Registered: 03/13/01
Posts: 665
|
John makes a very good point here. It really is not about versions and models but about dollar values. To trade in say a pair of M60s for 2pr of QS8s falls into the upgrade category in terms of dollars. We really just need the original new selling price of the trade-ins to be less than the current selling price of the upgrades by some margin to make all the numbers work. I will work out what that margin needs to be and make this modification to the pilot program.
_________________________
Ian Colquhoun President & Chief Engineer
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#383382 - 09/27/12 07:34 AM
Re: Trade-ups revisited
[Re: Ian]
|
shareholder in the making
Registered: 05/03/03
Posts: 17369
Loc: NoVA
|
Thanks, Ian. That was what I was trying to get at.
_________________________
DON'T... call me stupid!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#383400 - 09/27/12 10:42 AM
Re: Trade-ups revisited
[Re: Ian]
|
aficionado
Registered: 07/03/08
Posts: 655
Loc: Toronto
|
John makes a very good point here. It really is not about versions and models but about dollar values. To trade in say a pair of M60s for 2pr of QS8s falls into the upgrade category in terms of dollars. We really just need the original new selling price of the trade-ins to be less than the current selling price of the upgrades by some margin to make all the numbers work. I will work out what that margin needs to be and make this modification to the pilot program. This seems to be much like the previous incarnation of the trade-up provision and I would guess how popular a particular model that has been returned might be for ease of resale. I, for one, who have a VP160, might be interested in trading in mine with the black oak finish for a VP160 in the custom "high gloss" black. Would this be feasible?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#383402 - 09/27/12 11:57 AM
Re: Trade-ups revisited
[Re: Ian]
|
axiomite
Registered: 06/20/03
Posts: 7638
Loc: Tacoma
|
I like Casey and JohnK's ideas about basing the upgrade on pricing rather than model; the custom finish angle seems like something that could be popular in this scenario. It gives existing M80 V3 owners somewhere to upgrade, maybe.
_________________________
We are a whole community of "that guy" - StPatGuy
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#383435 - 09/28/12 07:21 AM
Re: Trade-ups revisited
[Re: CatBrat]
|
President
aficionado
Registered: 03/13/01
Posts: 665
|
CatBrat,
The EP350 and EP500 have a lot of differences. They look the same because they share the same cabinet but the EP500 has almost double the amp power, a longer x-max woofer, and a way more sophisticated control of the frequency response and max output limiting. This means it plays a lot louder, a lot lower, and never gives you a hint of straining. I think you would find it a nice upgrade.
Edited by Ian (09/28/12 07:25 AM)
_________________________
Ian Colquhoun President & Chief Engineer
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#383437 - 09/28/12 07:44 AM
Re: Trade-ups revisited
[Re: Ian]
|
shareholder in the making
Registered: 09/27/04
Posts: 10181
Loc: 543 miles North of VAST
|
Hmmmmm... 25% trade-in on my 2004 EP350. I'll have to find my original invoice to see what I paid for the sub at that time, but I'm preeeeeety sure I paid about $4000. Hey, upgrading to a new 500 just might work! 
_________________________
::::::: “Yum. I'd love to gnaw on those with my ears." :::::::
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#383446 - 09/28/12 09:50 AM
Re: Trade-ups revisited
[Re: MarkSJohnson]
|
aficionado
Registered: 11/16/10
Posts: 764
Loc: Victoria,BC
|
I have a VP150 and some QS4s that I wouldn't mind upgrading for some QS8s, if that is possible?
_________________________
Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#383447 - 09/28/12 10:14 AM
Re: Trade-ups revisited
[Re: Ian]
|
axiomite
Registered: 08/05/09
Posts: 5392
Loc: Kansas City, Missouri
|
CatBrat,
The EP350 and EP500 have a lot of differences. They look the same because they share the same cabinet but the EP500 has almost double the amp power, a longer x-max woofer, and a way more sophisticated control of the frequency response and max output limiting. This means it plays a lot louder, a lot lower, and never gives you a hint of straining. I think you would find it a nice upgrade. Thanks. I know what my next upgrade will probably be then, if I can get it for that price range (around $800). I've still got the original shipping box. I'm strapped for cash until November when I'll have my new TV paid off.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|