|
|
 Picked up a NAD t 163 today..
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863 |
So far I really like this unit.. MUCH more than the marantz receiver that it replaced.. it sounds really good. Its kind of hard to get use to the menu system, but im working on that. The sound quality of the unit VERY good.
|
|
|
Re: Picked up a NAD t 163 today..
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
The menu system has to be better than the Denons. 
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: Picked up a NAD t 163 today..
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 562
aficionado
|
|
aficionado
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 562 |
That stats on that piece sound very nice. What are you powering that with?
oz
"Life is what happens while your busy making other plans" John Lennon
|
|
|
Re: Picked up a NAD t 163 today..
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863
connoisseur
|
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863 |
a marantz mm9000
with the 2 units, the sound is unreal... before i had a marantz reciever.. and the sound from the reciever to the processor, is HUGE... so far im very happy..
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
0 members (),
704
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
