Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 5 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Re: Receiver: Arcam vs Marantz vs Integra
#127070 02/10/06 06:26 PM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 958
M
mwc Offline
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
M
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 958
Amen! can I get a witness?


I live the life I love and I love the life I live.
Re: Receiver: Arcam vs Marantz vs Integra
#127071 02/10/06 06:55 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331
I'm a witness! Speakers have the most effect, followed by the room. I don't think the influence the shape, size, and surfaces of a room can have on the sound of a system can be overemphasized.


Jack

"People generally quarrel because they cannot argue." - G. K. Chesterton
Re: Receiver: Arcam vs Marantz vs Integra
#127072 02/10/06 07:09 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
I would almost argue that room makes more difference than speakers once your speakers are up to a certain level (and IMO Axioms are above that level).


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: Receiver: Arcam vs Marantz vs Integra
#127073 02/10/06 07:10 PM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 958
M
mwc Offline
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
M
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 958
Amen!
I really wish the audio community (magazines, e-zine reviewers etc.) would put more emphasis on educating the audio buying public (us?) about the importance of room acoustics.


I live the life I love and I love the life I live.
Re: Receiver: Arcam vs Marantz vs Integra
#127074 02/10/06 07:18 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
... but then people wouldn't keep buying new equipment and new speakers in order to get the same sound their buddy has in HIS room


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: Receiver: Arcam vs Marantz vs Integra
#127075 02/10/06 07:27 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471
medic8r Offline OP
axiomite
OP Offline
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471
Wow, thanks a lot everyone for all of the helpful feedback. As my room is a little boxy and will be soundproofed by double sheet rock with green glue, I'm guessing that some curtains and/or some other sound absorbers will be needed liberally ...



Bears, beets, Battlestar Galactica.
Re: Receiver: Arcam vs Marantz vs Integra
#127076 02/10/06 07:33 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,749
Likes: 37
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,749
Likes: 37
An idiosyncratic orthodoxy has emerged on this site, an orthodoxy whose opinions have all the hallmarks of a "party line."

It is not surprising to hear folks announce that all amplifiers sound the same, or that different tubes of a type do not impart a different sound quality to a tube amp or other tube component. What is surprising is the mocking chorus which shouts down differing opinions.

First of all, to say that different tubes of type do not impart different sound quality to tube amps or output sections in tube components signifies to me that the proclaimer has no personal experience with tubes to base such an opinion. My experience of tube components is that different tubes (new, properly biased and performing to spec) have an obvious effect on sound quality.

Similarly, Alan Lofft's characterization of tube components as "distortion generators" is a laughable generalization, at least to anyone who has had the pleasure of listening to some of the wonderful tube amps and CD players with tube output sections currently on the market.

The idea that any solid state amp with similar output power rating and a similarly a flat frequency response output curve from 20Hz-20kHz will sound like any other amp with a similarly flat frequency response curve is demonstrably wrong. If this were the case, then folks who really 'know' would all be using the cheapest amp they could find. As to those here who hold the opinion that all amps sound the same, are there any among you who use separate amps? If so, would you let us know what kind of amps you use, and could you tell us whether you chose the cheapest amp you could find for your application?

You can look at your charts, but I suggest you listen to the music. As to A/B tests, I think they are valuable. I also think that much longer term experience with various components can reveal sonic qualities which are not immediately apparent in an A/B test. Ever notice how a system sometimes sounds better playing the same source material than at other times? If you have, how can that difference be revealed in an A/B test? It cannot because we are talking about perceived differences in an A/A situation. I think it would be fair to say that all similarly powerful amps with similar frequency response characteristics (flat from 20-20) will sound adequate or passable. Some will reproduce music with better sound quality - music magic - truer to the original source, more like live - with the same recordings - than others. Some will image better. Different amps will reproduce soundstaging differently. Some amps have better sound quality at lower volumes than others. It is not necessarily price dependent, but not all similarly spec'd amps are the same.

My opinion.

AMPS
T-Amps (modified) (7)
Kenwood KA9100
Yamaha M-80 (3)
Onkyo Integra M-504
Anthem PVA-5
Antique Sound Labs MG S1 15DT

CD SOURCES
Ah! Njoe Tjoeb tube output CDP
Philips SACD1000
Toshiba SD9200
Sony CX 90ES
Sony CA 7ES
Pioneer DV 578A

Speakers
Axiom M2e
Axiom QS8
Axiom M3Ti (gifted away)
Axiom M22Ti (returned)
Axiom M50 (sold)
Thiel CS3.6
Michaura M55
Michaura M66
Michaura M665
Merak MC6H modified
Merak MC634 modified
Mission 77ds
Dahlquist DQM905 with Regnar upgrades


Last edited by 2x6spds; 02/10/06 07:54 PM.

Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.
Re: Receiver: Arcam vs Marantz vs Integra
#127077 02/10/06 07:37 PM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 958
M
mwc Offline
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
M
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 958



I live the life I love and I love the life I live.
Re: Receiver: Arcam vs Marantz vs Integra
#127078 02/10/06 09:56 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
If the "party line" happens to be science and empiricism, I'll toe that line every. single. time.


Yet again, you are twisting words and obfuscating the issue. I am loathe to repeat myself needlessly, but since you obviously have not read any of my posts in this thread, I feel I am justified. I have not claimed that all amps sound the same. I have not claimed that different tubes sound alike. That is something you have invented as false evidence against the "idiosyncratic orthodoxy." (Might as well go all the way and call us the "axis of evil"....)
In reply to:

Similarly, Alan Lofft's characterization of tube components as "distortion generators" is a laughable generalization


Your inability to see that distortion simply means an introduction of something into or a substraction of something out of the original signal is laughable. Tubes do just this.
In reply to:

The idea that any solid state amp with similar output power rating and a similarly a flat frequency response output curve from 20Hz-20kHz will sound like any other amp with a similarly flat frequency response curve is demonstrably wrong.


Demonstrably wrong because of the evidence you cite? That people don't all own the cheapest amps? You call that evidence? Laughable.
In reply to:

I also think that much longer term experience with various components can reveal sonic qualities which are not immediately apparent in an A/B test.


The human being's auditory memory is demonstrably short. Any differences realized over the long term are most likely due to outside factors, not the least of which is faulty long term auditory memory. (It could be the relative humidity of the room, or you may have just gotten over a head cold that negatively impacted your hearing, etc., etc.)
In reply to:

...truer to the original source...


Ahhh. You should not have dropped that in your post. A well-designed solid state amp will pretty much always give you a truer to the original source output signal than a tube amp. (This goes back to the whole distortion thing.)

Re: Receiver: Arcam vs Marantz vs Integra
#127079 02/10/06 11:21 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,749
Likes: 37
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,749
Likes: 37
BTW, should be CA 9ES not CA 7ES, very nice CDP.

Of course the flat-worlders will tell you that all CD Players sound the same.


Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.
Page 5 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,477
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 923 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4