|
Re: Difference of 6.1 & 7.1 over 5.1
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 200
local
|
local
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 200 |
i did "upgrade" from a 5.0 setup to 7.1...at least in my experience there has been a much noticeable difference especially watching movies......just my little .02c
|
|
|
Re: Difference of 6.1 & 7.1 over 5.1
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 164
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 164 |
7.1, imho is the way to go. Get a receiver that can provide 7.1 channels, and you will be good to go. The offer for an audition is still open, so feel free to PM me, and we can set up a time. If not for anything else, you can hear how the QS8's sound...as compared to the M2's. I have both sets of speakers, though, I only have 2 M2's vs. 4 QS8's.
|
|
|
Re: Difference of 6.1 & 7.1 over 5.1
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Yes Drew, as some of the other replies have also indicated, receivers(your 2600 will have DPLIIx)have processing which extracts some of the sound(which belongs in surround farther back)which is naturally present in the two stereo channels or the side surround channels of 5.1 source material and steers it to surround speakers to give a better effect. In fact, the 6th channel material in a DD EX disc, which would provide a mono back effect, isn't used when DPLIIx is in effect. Instead material is extracted from the left side surround which should go to the left back and likewise for the right side, providing a stereo rear effect.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,477
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
946
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|