Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Upgrade receiver
#16131 07/28/03 12:42 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28
hobbyist
OP Offline
hobbyist
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28
Hi all. I recently purchased an Axiom set-up thanks to the advise on this board and others (M22s, VP150, QS4s, EP175). I am very happy with the sound, but now I may be getting an itch to upgrade my receiver, a Kenwood OR-507. What is the advise here? The Kenwood is listed at 100 watts per channel x 5, but I have no idea if that is accurate. I have pushed the volume up pretty high with no noticeable distortion & my listening level is lower than that test. Is there an advantage to a better receiver like cleaner sound or better imaging (finally learned what that means)? I don't want to spend the money unless there is a good reason. Also, some advise on what to upgrade to, if anything.
Thanks!

Re: Upgrade receiver
#16132 07/28/03 01:55 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Barry, assuming that your present receiver isn't being overdriven into gross distortion(it apparently isn't, from your description)you won't get cleaner sound or better imaging or anything else from a new receiver relating to basic sound quality. So, save your money and buy more CDs and DVDs unless there are some features on the new receivers that are irresistably attractive to you(e.g. automatic equalization, etc.).


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: Upgrade receiver
#16133 07/28/03 02:15 AM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 345
F
fhw Offline
devotee
Offline
devotee
F
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 345
Upgraditis is a severe, chronic disease. If you're happy with the way your system sounds, leave it as it is. Only if your needs change (ex. multi-room capability, component video switching, a much bigger rec room) should you start worrying about upgrades to your electronics.

To get a higher level of features isn't a huge investment these days (Denon, Yamaha and Onkyo make relatively cheap 6.1 models with component switching, for example), BUT for measurably better sound you're looking at companies like Rotel or Arcam...which will tack an extra grand onto the price of a receiver easily.

Re: Upgrade receiver
#16134 07/28/03 04:14 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28
hobbyist
OP Offline
hobbyist
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28
OK, but the one thing that worries me is this quote from Alan Lofft on purchasing a receiver: "the greatest source of damage to speakers is using too small amplifiers to drive speakers at high volumes, especially when you might "crank it up" at a party. The amp runs out of watts, distorts, and the distorted signal burns out tweeters or woofers in seconds".
How do I know if I am safe with the Kenwood VR-507?

Re: Upgrade receiver
#16135 07/28/03 04:35 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 171
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 171
Weebo,

I honestly don't think you have anything to worry about with the Kenwood in terms of not enough power. Even if Kenwood overstates their power, the VR-507 is a legitimate receiver that should easily power Axiom speakers. If you turn up the volume and it seems to be playing fine with no clipping, then the VR-507 should be fine.

Having said that, with respect to performance, I had been using a Kenwood VR-509 (essentially same as 507) receiver, and there was a pretty big jump in sound quality and performance when I switched to a H/K AVR520. I moved the Kenwood into my bedroom where it is powering Axiom M3's, and it is totally adequate for that purpose. But, the H/K's sound is just much more appealing to me than the Kenwood.

Re: Upgrade receiver
#16136 07/28/03 05:41 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28
hobbyist
OP Offline
hobbyist
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28
>>>>and there was a pretty big jump in sound quality and performance when I switched to a H/K AVR520

Darn, and I was just beginning to think I could avoid catching upgraditis :-)

Re: Upgrade receiver
#16137 07/28/03 07:40 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 171
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 171
Sorry Weebo. I wish I could tell you that there was no difference, but there is a reason that some receivers really are viewed in a different light than other receivers. The Kenwood really is a fine receiver--it gets the job done. But, if you were to step up to a brand like Harman Kardon, Denon, or various others, you very well may hear a tangible difference.

I purchased my Kenwood receiver in one of those HTIB systems--and I viewed it as basically a starting point in quality music and HT. I quickly replaced the stock Kenwood speakers with Axioms, and noticed a big jump in quality obviously. Then, I replaced the receiver with the H/K, and again saw a jump in quality. I love the H/K sound.

Re: Upgrade receiver
#16138 07/28/03 09:36 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28
hobbyist
OP Offline
hobbyist
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 28
Hey gem, looks like I may be following a similar path. My Kenwood is all that remains of my HTB-504!

Re: Upgrade receiver
#16139 07/29/03 12:13 AM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 345
F
fhw Offline
devotee
Offline
devotee
F
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 345
You'll know if your amp is distorting, because your system will sound bad. You'll be irritated well before the amps actually start clipping, unless you were in a situation where a child or a drunk friend decided to crank the volume in one quick twist.



Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,477
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 895 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4