 Re: Digital SLR users – input please.
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16 |
Thanks Adam. I don't remember where I read that stuff about the Nikon D40x, but the reviewer made a point to call out that it takes a special type or size lens other than the rest of the Nikon line...., I wish I could remember where I saw that.... that was about the only negative comment the reviewer had to say about it though.
So what's wrong with Olympus? Do they suck?
Last edited by mdrew; 05/28/07 12:21 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Digital SLR users – input please.
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 44
buff
|
|
buff
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 44 |
Quote:
I don't remember where I read that stuff about the Nikon D40x, but the reviewer made a point to call out that it takes a special type or size lens other than the rest of the Nikon line.
DPReview: D40X
Read the 'Cons' under conclusions for a description of the AF "issue".
Quote:
So what's wrong with Olympus? Do they suck?
I've never used the Oly... but in the world of SLRs, the main two are Canon and Nikon. There are just so many bodies, lenses, etc. for these systems you can't really go wrong. If you buy lenses for the Rebel XTi and decide you want to upgrade to a $8k 1-Series, the lenses will work.
-Todd...
|
|
|
Re: Digital SLR users – input please.
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16
connoisseur
|
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16 |
Ya, that's where I saw that! So what do you think about that? Is it a big enough issue to drop that camera off my shopping list? I live out in the boonies 300 miles from the nearest city where I can handle cameras so this information is helpful for when I do venture towards civilization and check these things out. I need to take a trip next week, so I’ll be looking then. If I do pick up a canon next week, what lens would you recommend I pick up for multi use? I would like one lens that would get in the way while I’m being Joe Tourist in Germany this fall. One that’s good for scenery, buildings, people, beer tents  and those dusk/night shots while wandering around the cities…. When I’m traveling, I don’t like to have much hanging off my neck if you know what I mean. Thanks again Todd.
|
|
|
Re: Digital SLR users – input please.
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
|
|
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7 |
300 miles from the nearest city? My head is spinning.
|
|
|
Re: Digital SLR users – input please.
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 44
buff
|
|
buff
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 44 |
Quote:
Ya, that's where I saw that! So what do you think about that? Is it a big enough issue to drop that camera off my shopping list?
I don't really see it as a huge issue, but it really depends on what lenses you were planning on using in the long run. If you knew there was a specific lens you wanted to use that was not AF-S or AF-I.
Quote:
If I do pick up a canon next week, what lens would you recommend I pick up for multi use?
It depends on your budget... my personal 'all around' favorite is the 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS, but it's ~$400. Also, with the 1.6xCF on the XTi the 28mm can be a tad tight... 28mm x 1.6 = ~50mm, which is the 'standard' length for film cameras. If you are serious about landscapes you may be better off with two (or more) lenses... but for a single walk around lens the 28-135 is great. I'd be interested to check-out the EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS, but that's around $500. If that is out of your price range there are some other lenses, but I'm not really up on them.
Wide angles (landscapes) between 17-30mm, Standard (what your eye sees) is 50mm, Portraits go around 135mm, and sports and stuff over 200mm. It's tough to get one lens that covers it all, but there are some good pairs (like the 24-70mm, then the 70-200, a 300, and 500, etc.).
-Todd...
|
|
|
Re: Digital SLR users – input please.
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458 |
Mike: I'd lean towards the Rebel as well. Don't forget other lens manufacturers either to save some money.... Something like this might do the job for you... You can get it at a reputable dealer like B&H for $379.
::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
|
|
|
Re: Digital SLR users – input please.
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
So it's advisable to go with Sigma? I'd been planning on sticking with Canon lenses, whenever I have the disposable income for that instead of the other 14 expensive hobbies I have. 
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: Digital SLR users – input please.
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 44
buff
|
|
buff
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 44 |
Quote:
So it's advisable to go with Sigma?
I prefer the Canon/Nikon glass as to the 'knock-offs'. They are of higher quality and hold their value longer. They are a great alternative to get you into something with better features (for example, 70-200mm f/2.8 from sigma rather than the 70-200mm f/4 from Canon).
Like everything in this world, you get what you way for.
-Todd...
|
|
|
Re: Digital SLR users – input please.
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458 |
Quote:
Like everything in this world, you get what you way for.
True, Todd.... but this isn't for professional use. I think the average amateur would be better off buying two Sigmas than one Canon or Nikon piece of glass....
I think the Sigmas are much like Axioms: They get you 90% of the way there for 1/3 the cost...
::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
|
|
|
Re: Digital SLR users – input please.
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16
connoisseur
|
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16 |
Thanks guys. The more I read up on these things, the Rebel seams like the logical choice. I’ve got to have image stabilization, regardless. Does that Sigma have it? I didn’t notice it noted anywhere.
Circling back to the Olympus Evolt 510. There’s not much written on it yet seeing how it isn’t available yet. One thing I did see however is they are calling it a four thirds frame. I know it’s smaller, but why call it 4/3’s? That’s larger than one to one. I don’t get it.
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
0 members (),
485
guests, and
3
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
