Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Preferred Digital Audio File Type
#187690 12/12/07 10:42 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 52
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 52
Aloha again Axiomites. Just got a new Squeezebox - no more expensive than another multidisk changer. I'm trying to decide what file type / quality to use for ripping CD's. I was hoping to get feedback regarding the levels at which users can actually hear audible differences on their systems. For example, 128 kbs MP3 sounds good on computer speakers, but can a difference be heard when using higher sampling rates or lossless encoding like flac ?

Re: Preferred Digital Audio File Type
muttsinparadise #187691 12/12/07 10:45 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
I recently heard somemusic in flac and it sounded pretty good, better than MP3.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: Preferred Digital Audio File Type
jakewash #187693 12/12/07 10:48 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
Lossless will be significantly better than mp3s encoded at 128kbps. When you get to 256kbps and beyond, then it becomes very difficult to tell the difference.

Re: Preferred Digital Audio File Type
muttsinparadise #187695 12/12/07 10:49 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
It depends on your system. I cannot hear a significant difference on my iPod above 192K, but a big one from 128K/192K and a slight one between 160K/192K.

On my sound systen, with my older speakers (DBX-1000; don't even try to look for them on the Web!), I could barely hear the difference between 256K and a CD (but yes with under 256K), so I scanned everything at 320K to be on the safe side. After I received my M80s, I had to rescan everything as lossless. So, again, it depends a lot on what you listen to and on what you do it. Also, I think newer formats such as Vorbis are much better, but I never had the chance to try it on my sound system.


See Mojo's signature
Re: Preferred Digital Audio File Type
EFalardeau #187696 12/12/07 11:00 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
T
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
Lossless is forever. Storage is cheap. FLAC me, baby.


bibere usque ad hilaritatem
Re: Preferred Digital Audio File Type
tomtuttle #187709 12/13/07 12:29 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
I can't hear a difference above 160-192K in an AAC file. Not sure about mp3. In any case, I rip at 256K now, mainly because I still use a 2 GB nano.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Preferred Digital Audio File Type
Ken.C #187711 12/13/07 12:50 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
 Originally Posted By: kcarlile
I can't hear a difference above 160-192K in an AAC file.

On what are you listening them?


See Mojo's signature
Re: Preferred Digital Audio File Type
EFalardeau #187712 12/13/07 01:00 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
M80s.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Preferred Digital Audio File Type
EFalardeau #187713 12/13/07 01:04 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 395
devotee
Offline
devotee
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 395
I redid all my stuff in 320 VBR for space reasons and there is a significant difference from 192 .mp3 (on computer or Creative Zen Nomad).
However, for home, if you've got the space I would go with FLAC.


M80s/VP160/QS8s/EP350; M22s; M3s.
Re: Preferred Digital Audio File Type
doormat #187802 12/13/07 05:12 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
The clarity of my M60s made me re-rip everything into flac. I am much happier now.

At the same time, I also re-ripped everything to a parallel library of 256 MP3 for my MP3 portable. I experimented and I couldn't tell the dif between 192 and 256 on the portable but I went 256 just in case players improve someday.

I love the Squeezebox. It is normally the first thing I click on , after lights, as soon as I get home.


With great power comes Awesome irresponsibility.
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,944
Posts442,472
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (rrlev), 365 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4