Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
m60 vs. m80 for HT.
#193034 01/19/08 05:49 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9
B
Bart Offline OP
regular
OP Offline
regular
B
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9
These will be in a basement that is 12 x 25 with 7.5 ceillings. I will be running them from a Yamaha 6190b. The main use will be HT, and 2 channel audio will be the secondary use. I have an SVS sub, so bass should not be an issue. I know the m60 is 8ohm and the m80 is 4ohm. The 6190 supports both 8 and 4 ohm. Will I be losing anything other then a little bass by going with the m60 over the m80? Please recommend m60 0r m80. Price is not a big issue, but saving a few bucks never hurts. Thanks.

Re: m60 vs. m80 for HT.
Bart #193050 01/19/08 07:41 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 24
M
hobbyist
Offline
hobbyist
M
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 24
i would just call Axioms 800 number. They recommended I get the M60's - driving them with a Sony 5300ES and my room is 13x19x10. Sound can knock the paint off the walls. They won't steer you wrong.

Re: m60 vs. m80 for HT.
Major #193055 01/19/08 10:16 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
It becomes a personal preference at this point I found the M60s vocals to take a back seat to the music ever so slightly directly compared to the M80s. Other than that and the slightly lower/smoother bass, they are almost identical. I would never go back to the M60 after hearing the M80s and now owning.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: m60 vs. m80 for HT.
jakewash #193062 01/19/08 01:00 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 738
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 738
Your room is 2250 cubic feet, which is about average, you probaly don't need the extra power handeling of the M80's (unless you want to be deaf in less than a year?).

If you are using them only for HT I think you would love the M60's. A great speaker. If however you also want to listen to 2 channel music (no sub) I would go with the M80's. The extra bass extension of the 80's (which is suble but audable, doesn't require a sub (for most music) IMO and my listening room.

Both are excellent speakers and you'll probably keep them for life. It was a tough decision for me.

Paul

Last edited by Worfzara; 01/19/08 01:00 PM.

paul

Axiom M80, VP180, Qs8, EP500
Epson 3020
Rotel RB-880
Denon AVR-990
Re: m60 vs. m80 for HT.
Worfzara #193064 01/19/08 01:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
I've owned both and they are both great audiophile speakers. The 80's are the top of the line right now, and the 60's are very close. The 80's are a little more detailed and go a little lower. I think most people would be hard pressed to see much difference, unless they are playing at concert levels. \:\)

if you check the graphs for each on the product page you will see how similar performing they are in lab tests. My room is huge and I was totally happy with the 60's as well as my current 80's.






M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: m60 vs. m80 for HT.
SirQuack #193073 01/19/08 03:13 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,333
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,333
You may enjoy reading this series as well...http://www.axiomaudio.com/boards/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=177510#Post177510

If Mojo had done this before I got the 80's, I would have gone with the 60's. Am I sending the 80's back for a swap? Heck no.

Scott


Scott

My HT
Re: m60 vs. m80 for HT.
a401classic #193233 01/21/08 07:56 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
 Originally Posted By: a401classic

If Mojo had done this before I got the 80's, I would have gone with the 60's. Am I sending the 80's back for a swap? Heck no.

Scott


Curious as to why you say you would have gone with the M60s?

It bothered me that there was a noticeable drop in vocals/upper FR from the M60s to my M22s which is what prompted me to get together with Mojo for a direct comparison of all the speakers we had.

I found the 60s to be nearly identical to the M80s once the volume is turned up closer to the one watt(85db+)but for the lower volumes the differences were noticeable.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,944
Posts442,472
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 528 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4