Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Wireless G versus N
#194782 02/02/08 04:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
OP Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
Just curious if anyone has upgraded their B or G wireless setup to the newer N technology? It appears to be faster and achieve further distances.

Right now my HTPC uses a Belkin G adapter and my Qwest DSL G router is upstairs at the other end of the house. For the most part it works pretty good, but at times the signal is weaker and I don't always get 50mbps.

Prices on the N stuff seem to be dropping and was wondering if it would help overall, especially for internet videos/music transfer.

thanks, Randy


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: Wireless G versus N
SirQuack #194790 02/02/08 05:06 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
I have been using wireless g for my xbox 360 gaming and have not noticed any difference from when I was using a wired connection.

My router is not far from my console though... maybe 50+feet.

my wifi for my denon seems to work great as wireless G as well


-David
Re: Wireless G versus N
terzaghi #194812 02/02/08 10:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
OP Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
I'm not talking about wireless versus wired, I'm talking about wireless "G" versus the new "N" protocol. N is supposed to transmit upto 100mbps versuse the 50mbps of "G", and have a much farther range.

My HTPC is 60ft away in the basement on opposite ends of the house. It works fairly well most of the time, but the "N" may prove to provide faster throughput.


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: Wireless G versus N
SirQuack #194820 02/02/08 11:16 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
I understood your question, I was just thinking that the new wireless N would be more like a standard wired connection (100mbps)(I guess I didn't really specify that though \:\) )

I think it would be benneficial for many uses, I was just stating that the new technology may not be good for gaming.

Same thing for internet streaming...I am not sure if it would make a huge difference. It seems to me the limiting factor would be how fast your computer can get the info from the internet (typically less than 10mbps on a FAST connection.) So I am not sure if the 100mbps would be of much use.

However, I could see the advantages of Wireless N for streaming content stored locally on a computer.

Either way, I am sure that The Wireless N is much better than G.... But you would have to upgrade both your router and access point/wireless device. Not sure if it is worth the extra $$ right now. (at least not for me)

Last edited by terzaghi; 02/02/08 11:21 PM.

-David
Re: Wireless G versus N
terzaghi #194828 02/03/08 01:06 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
I am using a N router configured to run as BG mixed just for the added distance. It works great. I had tried range extenders and higher gain atennaes, all of which failed to reach the outer corners of my house consistantly. I went to the N router in the hopes of the MIMO technology giving me better coverage and it does exactly as I had hoped.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: Wireless G versus N
jakewash #194908 02/04/08 06:28 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,185
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,185
Ah, 11n... I love and hate it. I'm pretty involved in it so feel free to ping me. (HA! Dumb joke...)

In order for you to take full advantage of 11n (802.11n), you really want to make sure that both ends are 11n (PC and router). Also, if you run in a mixed environment where you have some B and/or G clients, your overall throughput drops to the lowest common denominator. So even if you have an 11n router, if ANY client is 802.11b, your whole wireless network drops to that rate. You can also do what I do. I have an older router run at 802.11g rates, any old clients connect to that. I then run an Apple Extreme at 5 GHz 11n only, so any FAST clients connect to that and don't get bogged down by the older stuff. 5 GHz is also good because your network doesn't get affected by microwaves. The bad thing is that 5 GHz has shorter range than 2.5GHz.

Another way to mix is to also use some powerline Ethernet adapters so you can use your AC wiring to extend your network. For the most part, wired willl ALWAYS be faster than wireless.

But as jake mentioned, you can also use the multiple antennas of 11n routers to take advantage with 11b/g as well. Though you can't take advantage of the > 100Mbps rates.

Last edited by oldskoolboarder; 02/04/08 06:29 AM.
Re: Wireless G versus N
oldskoolboarder #194909 02/04/08 07:34 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
It's my understanding that in mixed mode you will get true N speeds as long as no other (B or G) is transmitting at the same time as the N system is communicating, once one of the older standards starts transmitting the system then drops to the lowest common denominator.

I am glad you brought up the Ethernet over power lines, I have been thinking of doing this for a couple of the more used PC's in the house. Does it work as well as true cat5/6 wired systems?


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: Wireless G versus N
SirQuack #194931 02/04/08 04:50 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,333
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,333
I'm running a Belkin N1 and love it. I can get a signal anywhere on my acre property and it's faster than my internet connection (3.0 Gb/S).

Scott


Scott

My HT
Re: Wireless G versus N
jakewash #194956 02/04/08 07:42 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,185
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,185
Jason
You are correct. I was referring to running 11n in legacy mode.

I use some Netgear XE104 and 103 devices, rated at 85 Mbps. That's theoretical, you never really get that speed but if your network is only fast ethernet (10/100 Mbps) it's OK. There are units that run up to 200 MBps, which are only useful if you have gigabit ethernet everywhere in your house.


Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,473
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 360 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4