 Re: Bang for the $ - 80/350 or 4x M80+VP150+EP350 ?
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488 Likes: 9
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488 Likes: 9 |
Unless you plan to listen ONLY to music (and music recorded multichannel, not just PL2 or the other algos), then the QS8 will be more satisfying.
Mojo's point number 3 is not to be taken lightly.
See Mojo's signature
|
|
|
Re: Bang for the $ - 80/350 or 4x M80+VP150+EP350
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,854
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,854 |
The alternative with the Qs8s will allow you to upgrade the sub to the EP500. THAT would be some serious bang for the buck.
|
|
|
Re: Bang for the $ - 80/350 or 4x M80+VP150+EP350
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490 Likes: 116
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490 Likes: 116 |
After hearing the 350V3 and comparing it to my 600, I don't believe there's any reason to go beyond a 350V3.
House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
|
|
|
Re: Bang for the $ - 80/350 or 4x M80+VP150+EP350
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955 |
But what about the "my model number is bigger than your model number" argument!!! You crazy pacifist!!!  
With great power comes Awesome irresponsibility.
|
|
|
Re: Bang for the $ - 80/350 or 4x M80+VP150+EP350
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488 Likes: 9
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488 Likes: 9 |
It's V3 against V2!
See Mojo's signature
|
|
|
Re: Bang for the $ - 80/350 or 4x M80+VP150+EP350
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
11,000 cu ft standard? My room is 8,000 cu ft and I think that is huge, not standard in my find.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: Bang for the $ - 80/350 or 4x M80+VP150+EP350
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490 Likes: 116
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490 Likes: 116 |
I classified "standard" as 11,000 cubic feet or less. Rooms of this size would be well-served by M80s.
Rooms larger than 11,000 cubic feet likely need larger speakers such as line arrays.
House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
|
|
|
Re: Bang for the $ - 80/350 or 4x M80+VP150+EP350
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955 |
11,0000 standard? You must use the same tape measure as the sign maker in this photo.... 
With great power comes Awesome irresponsibility.
|
|
|
Re: Bang for the $ - 80/350 or 4x M80+VP150+EP350
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 1
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 1 |
Well, the sign does specify the measurements as +/-. A little wiggle room.
***********
"Nothin' up my sleeve. . ." --Bullwinkle J. Moose
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,473
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
0 members (),
375
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
