Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Windows Vista HTPC
jakewash #203014 04/03/08 01:13 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
Actually, it means walking away from some media distribution forms such as cable, which is exactly what I have done.

I get very annoyed by all the crap I have to go through just to get a few decent channels. I won't be going back until such time as I can watch ONLY the content I want when I want to. Anything less is not worth it to me.

Add DRM and it just pushes me further away.

If DRM software is going to force me to re-boot my too often because its poorly implemented I will walk away from that as well. I get very annoyed when DHCP informs me that there is something wrong with my hardware on a 480p movie.

At some point, bandwidth will no longer be an issue, and stations can offer me content directly again. That will make things interesting. If that dosn't happen, oh well.





Last edited by fredk; 04/03/08 01:14 AM.

Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Re: Windows Vista HTPC
fredk #203015 04/03/08 01:25 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
You speak of a utopia that I am fairly certain will never happen. \:\( Actually being able to choose only the material you want is not in the best interest of the providers, as too many people would only a select few channels and the provider's revenue/profits would drop.

I remember satelite TV was supposed to be this utopia, a pick only what you want type of medium and now look what they have done, bundled everthing up into specific packages to force you to pay for channels very few people actually want, but still allow you to pay more for the higher packages to get all the channels you are truly interested in.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: Windows Vista HTPC
jakewash #203022 04/03/08 09:17 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
Perhaps. Cable and satalite companies are only middle men. They make their money because there is no way for the content producers, the stations, to get to their audience directly beyond a certain geographic area.

With the internet, we have more content pipes coming into our homes. As I understand it, cable companies have never paid the stations for the content that they deliver to us and I bet thats a real sore point.

If people like PBS were to be able to come to some agreement with the telcos for delivering on-demand content they would jump at the opportunity.

And if its a big pipe dream, oh well. I'll find other ways to amuse myself.

FWIW there is already a hint of change. Cable operators are starting to offer channels on an ala-carte basis. Still gotta pay for the first 30 channels of junk, but its a step in the right direction.


Fred

-------
Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,944
Posts442,472
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 344 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4