Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
osund of cone vs dome in mids
#2126 03/20/02 06:18 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I understand Axioms (M22's, M3's) crossover around 3.7khz while many competitors crossover at a much lower, (ie Paradigm xover at 1500hz).

My question is, characteristics would I typically 'hear' when that 1500-3700hz range is produced with a cone midbass driver (ala Axiom) vs a dome tweeter (ala Para)? I'd be interested in any and all comments
Thanks,
Peter C

Re: osund of cone vs dome in mids
#2127 03/30/02 12:40 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 8
Ian Offline
President
connoisseur
Offline
President
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 8
The actual sound produced at each frequency from a cone or a dome is the same. The reason for trying to get the tweeter crossover frequency down low is because smaller diaphragms tend to have better off axis performance. This only holds true to a point mind you where the wavelengths of the frequencies start to get long enough that the larger diaphragms will also give you perfect off axis dispersion. The above being said, it would seem on the surface that lower tweeter crossover points are desirable but there are actually some serious drawbacks to doing this. The smaller cone will start to have a very difficult time reproducing the lower frequencies you are asking of it without distortion as you increase the output. This will make the speaker very irritating at higher volume. We always try to get the best possible off axis response from the mid bass drivers as opposed to lowering the crossover frequency to the tweeter to achieve the desired off axis performance.


Ian Colquhoun
President & Chief Engineer
Re: osund of cone vs dome in mids
#2128 03/31/02 07:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 6
connoisseur
Online Content
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 6
I remember reading about the Human hearing range in a medical journal. The crux of the discussion centered around the frquency range of a typical human. The test data indicated that the range can be as wide as 20hz to 20khz, with wide variances downwards. But that human hearing is most sensitive in the 200hz to 2khz range.

If this is in fact true, then it would make absolute sense to keep a crossover point out of this range. While there are several well employed crossover designs, all add problems into the equation.


Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,943
Posts442,465
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
1 members (BBIBH), 580 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4